Skip to content

5% positive media coverage for President Trump = 5% too much

October 7, 2017

Well, the media hasn’t let up at all in it’s effort to divide the country and discourage Trump supporters. Frankly, I surely believe the negativity and out-right lies about the president is only securing his 2nd term, should he decide to run again. Hell, it takes a mass shooting to get the media to focus on something else besides Melania Trump wearing sunglasses after daylight to the President’s limo going through a yellow traffic light. Then that lasts only a day or so and it’s intermingled with more negative bullshit about the president. I stumbled across this article about a study by the Pew Research Center. The study involved 3,000 articles from 24 different news sources during President Trump’s first 100 days in office. Five (5) percent were positive. Rather stunning? Not according to certain lewd fellows of the baser sort … ie … liberals. That is five percent too many.

Anyway here’s some excerpts from the article

Via: The Epoch Times

Media Give Trump Most Negative Presidential Coverage in 25 Years
Only 5 percent of news reports are positive, according to Pew Research Center

Claims by President Donald Trump that media organizations primarily report negatively on him were proven true by new research by Pew Research Center.

An analysis of 3,000 stories during the first 100 days of his presidency across 24 different media organizations found that reporting on Trump has been the most negative compared to other presidents over the past 25 years.

The research shows that only 5 percent of media reporting during the period was positive. Sixty-two percent of the stories were negative, and 33 percent were neither positive nor negative.

By comparison, coverage of President Barack Obama during the same time period was 42 percent positive, and 20 percent negative. For President George W. Bush the number was 22 percent positive, and 28 percent negative. And for President Bill Clinton it was 27 percent positive, and 28 percent negative.

The study also revealed that most media coverage of Trump focused on his character traits rather than policy.

Only 31 percent of all stories published on Trump focused on policy issues, compared to 50 percent for Obama, 65 percent for Bush, and 58 percent for Clinton.

“The evaluations of President Trump were far more negative and less positive than those of his predecessors,” wrote the Pew Research Center.


And for those who want to drivel that this study was done by a right-wing publication of which only conservatives regard, click on the provided link for Pew Research Center and it breaks down all the sources in which the study was taken.

It’s pretty evident the major media is cemented in the liberal agenda and are simply the outlet of which the left and Democrats can manipulate public opinion on just about everything. The tried and true method of “lie, repeat and repeat and repeat until it becomes ‘truth'” is the modus  operandi of the Democrat Party via the major news media. This folks is why beyond any doubt the major media is the greatest threat to America we face and have been dealing with for literal decades. When you have better than 300 million people and a great majority watch the major news networks for information, and said information is slanted left, false, disparages the President, Christians, conservatives, and refuses to report on issues of vital importance to the public, then little wonder why there are so many liberals and or misinformed people in America right now. This is why the economic growth is over 3% right now … never achieved by Obama and company … but no one knows about it. This is why unemployment is at 4.2% right now but no one knows about it. All we know is Trump’s latest gaffs, what his wife is wearing and Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s opinions about Trump’s policies which naturally are dangerous and dark. You know, vetting immigrants from hostile Islamic countries and deporting illegals is dangerous for America. Protecting unborn children from being torn apart during late-term abortions is “dangerous” for women’s reproductive rights. Obama’s trading of five high-ranking Taliban members for one deserter plus a few pallet loads of cash as ransom is good. Providing 1/5 of the uranium in the U.S. to the Russians … good (probably just for microwave ovens, etc). Letting Iran stop inspections of their nuclear processing sites … good. Open borders … good. Releasing of illegal aliens with criminal backgrounds into American cities (Obama)… good. Stopping that (Trump)… bad. Racking up $10 TRILLION in national debt … (Obama) good. Cutting taxes for everyone (Trump) bad, especially those dastardly small business owners who employ tens of thousands of people … bad, bad, bad Donald Trump.

Have a great weekend folks.


4 Comments leave one →
  1. October 7, 2017 5:00 pm

    Reblogged this on The way I see things ….


  2. October 8, 2017 4:15 am

    Well, sir, perhaps the question is not about the audacity of the media “picking” on Trump but rather WHY the media is allegedly picking on Trump. Also, why does the right always have to promote Trump’s wonderful accomplishments by referencing anything Obama or the Clintons have done, or not? Why can’t he ride on his own record?
    It’s also interesting that his “accomplishments” were, at best, matters of him just showing up during an upswing in the economy during the Obama years, and of decrees, and not one bit about Congressional success.

    Speaking of polls… Politifact reports that Trump has told the truth or “mostly true” only 17% of the time. The man flat out lies… and is totally consumed with bravado. I’m sure the right will dismiss Politifact, whatever.

    The fact is, the video doesn’t lie. You mentioned it yourself, “..his latest gaffs”, well, he gaffs constantly. Why doesn’t he learn from them? Because to him they are not gaffs.

    You might want to consider, there’s a fair number of conservatives that don’t favor his performance.

    I am still curious… I mentioned before that I have never “worshiped” a president in my entire life. I don’t even bestow that amount of reverence to Washington or Lincoln, albeit I may admire them and their accomplishments. So.. please share.. why this blind following of the man with so many personal social. moral, and professional faults? It’s rather like the right feeds on their intensity to favor Trump as being determined by the intensity those of “us” who don’t like the man.


    • October 8, 2017 7:26 am

      LOL! I could have written your comment for you brother Doug. You’re as predictable as anyone on the left. Shooting … go immediately after gun control. President Trump … “quote POLITICO yet point out any favorable polling as “right wing havens. Late term abortion = women’s reproductive health rights. Like I said in the title 5% good press = 5% too much for the left. I know this will be difficult to grasp but I will attempt to type s l o w e r … the post isn’t “worshipping” anyone (Mr. Trump wasn’t my first choice and I voted for Ted Cruz in the Texas primary) … it’s calling for fair, unbiased reporting by an unbiased media which we don’t have, but you see that’s cool for you … because it’s concerning Trump … a guy you can’t stand. The left feeds off that negativity. I have to admit I wrote some of this precisely to confirm my suspicions on how you’d react and I couldn’t have been more right on. Anyway, I’m not feeling too good this morning and might lay back down for a while once these “pain ‘pillars’ begin to work. Have a great Sunday.


    • October 9, 2017 7:22 pm

      Almost like we are married. You’re pressing my buttons to get a reply. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

What do you think about it?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: