Skip to content

Obama to pardon Hillary …

November 13, 2016

Folks, the liberal lunatics whose bizarre ideals lost the election have doubled-down on their lunacy. The media whose incredible unbridled bias against Trump was on full display is hammering out every kind of fear story, fake emotional drivel and the like to stoke up and create more chaos and unrest. The major media has zero credibility at all yet you can go to Yahoo, CNN, ABC, NBC, etc. and they “report” the same b.s. like nothing happened. And the same morons who were all but convinced that Hillary was going to win the election are being led about by the same media who’s been lying to everyone constantly.

Trump has chosen Steve Bannon and Reince Priebus to head up his leadership team as in Chief of Staff and chief strategist. Naturally, and without missing a beat criticism abounds. The Tea Party is exclaiming that Trump promised to “drain the swamp” and selecting Priebus as Chief of Staff he is simply adding to the swamp because they feel Priebus is a Washington “insider.” Gawd! Trump will drain the swamp of the corrupt freaks who are destroying the nation, what is there not to get about that? Hell, he could choose the freaking Pope and it wouldn’t be good enough for a bunch of people. I think we should should just sit back and see if Trump does what he said he would do. If he doesn’t then he’ll be gone.

The Republicans have the Executive Branch, the House and the Senate. Now is the time to really shine the spot light on the weasels to see if they will honor those who voted them in. There is no place for the RINOs to hide now. If the Democrats “obstruct” then it’s going to be obvious and we can send their asses back to where ever they came from.


Okay, having rambled on about nothing, I find the following stuff very curious.

A writer over at LAWFARE says that Obama should issue a pardon to Hillary Clinton regarding her negligent handling of classified and Top Secret information. You know, the stuff that endangered the national security of the United States, put agents operating abroad in danger and exposed those little secrets to nations who would be delighted to wipe us off the face of the earth … and maybe the information she exposed to them could be useful to that end. Those little things she used one device for … er … 13 devices … no classified emails … er … a few thousand classified emails … she turned over all … except a few hundred thousand … Barack found out about on the news … er … he was exchanging classified information with her via email, via an alias …

That stuff, for “the sake of the nation,” Obama should pardon her. Because those nasty Republicans might use those fake crimes to “punish” her … you know politically.


We want to make the case here that President Obama should pardon Clinton even though there is no evidence she has committed crimes—but should do so only if she wishes it. Pardoning Clinton would free the country from a divisive burden and it would actually be a gift to his successor, though Trump and his supporters will likely rail against the faux injustice. And while accepting this offer would carry some risk for Clinton of inadvertently appearing to acknowledge guilt, we would hope she would accept the pardon as a service to the nation.

It is important to be clear that the case for a pardon is not predicated on the idea that Clinton might actually be in criminal jeopardy. All evidence suggests the contrary. FBI Director Comey announced that, based on a thorough review of the evidence, no reasonable prosecutor would charge her based on her use of a private email server. And he reaffirmed that conclusion even in the face of the recently discovered set of emails, which did not in any way change his judgment on the matter. For all the talk of “corruption” at the Clinton Foundation, there appears to be no colorable suggestion of criminal wrongdoing adequate even to open a full investigation of the matter—despite all the smoke and malicious politically-motivated leaks that emerged in the finals days of the campaign.

At one point the writer referred to Obama’s refusal to prosecute the CIA operatives who ‘tortured’ prisoners back when Bush was president. Folks, the only reason Obama didn’t prosecute them is because he would not have gotten a conviction. HERE is a link to numerous articles regarding that. Most are media sources calling for prosecution of Bush etc. The same players for the left: Washington Post, the U.N., POLITICO, The New York Times, etc.

Anyway the writer continues …

Obama should not allow this to happen. And because he is still the President, his pardon is a trump card against Trump on this score. By issuing a blanket pardon for any crimes Clinton may have committed, he can strangle an overtly political investigation in its crib. Doing so would spare the country a deeply divisive wound at a time when the Republic is especially fragile and does not need the additional fault line caused by Trump’s trying to fulfill an irresponsible campaign promise. And Trump and his crew should thank Obama if he does it; pardoning Clinton will spare them from being pressured to either follow through on this reckless promise or risk losing face.

That said, there is at least one big problem with a pardon: It will make Hillary Clinton look guilty of crimes. It will make her look as if she needs the protection of the pardon power to prevent investigation of her behavior. And it risks validating Trump’s insistence that the system is rigged to protect her.

So, getting a pardon will make Hillary appear guilty of crimes? Really? Does anyone think for a second that Hillary gives a rat’s ass about appearing guilty? She’s appeared guilty for decades because she is guilty.

The writer claims that the FBI cleared Hillary of any wrong doing. I’m still scratching my head on that. If she’s been cleared, why does she need a pardon?

I think that if Obama doesn’t actively stop any and all investigations, indictments are in store for Hillary and company … of which ‘company’ Obama just happens to be in. If Obama pardons her, all will stop … everyone escapes. I’m not sure about the pardon thing. Can the president pardon someone for crimes the person isn’t even charged with yet? I’m sure Obama is working on it. I’m willing to bet Obama will pardon her. He’s got his own ass to cover. Not to mention Loretta Lynch’s, Hillary’s, Bill Clinton’s, Huma’s, possibly Chelsea’s and anyone else who might implicate him.

CLICK RIGHT HERE to read the article. The way it’s written illustrates that the media really knows we Americans are incredibly stupid and buying into that argument will confirm it. “For the sake of the country.” Give me a break!


And I can’t help myself … Suck it up liberals, Democrats, RINOs, morons, phony Christians, #Never Trumpsters, third party voters, Hollywood freaks, BLM, ACLU, terrorists, illegal aliens, “college educated” snow flakes, and media intellects …

6 Comments leave one →
  1. November 13, 2016 10:46 pm

    The insiders are always going to have each other’s backs and nothing about that will ever change because that is how they are. As to Trump being accused of loading his cabinet with lobbyists and insiders let me say this: The President Elect has to work with what is available and as he pointed out in a pre-recorded and obviously edited interview on a really big national TV program this evening there is presently nobody in Washington who is not either an insider or a lobbyist so he has to work with what he has available to him. No brainer there, folks. He doesn’t have a choice. He has to work with what there is to work with and right now that is a whole Washington D.C., packed with insiders and lobbyists. But if he is given time and a chance, I am sure he will cause some insiders and lobbyists to get on board with the program of unification and forwarding the best interests of the country. The key of course is to see that he gets that chance and a little cooperation from the entrenched. America is demanding change and if Trump is to be the agent of change, then somebody up there in Washington ought to be able to recognize a need to get with the program.

    Liked by 2 people

    • November 14, 2016 5:07 am

      Amen John. I’m going to post something about that stuff some time today to get what I think about it out.


  2. November 14, 2016 8:05 am

    He can’t pardon her if she hasn’t been charged with a crime (from what I’ve read.) If she had been charged and he pardoned her, he would be destroying his precious “legacy” which is all he really cares about. IMHO

    Liked by 1 person

    • November 14, 2016 8:21 am

      I was wondering if he could issue some kind of blanket pardon for crimes she “may have” committed. It seems kind of weird, but I’m sure Obama and company are looking for some loop-hole for doing just that. We’ll see. I’m hoping his “legacy” is tanked. Folks are already, since last Tuesday spouting off that Trump is changing his mind or lied to us about all kinds of stuff. I think he’s keeping his plans ‘close to the vest’ until he appoints staff and cabinet positions and he’s sworn in. I don’t think he’s the kind of guy who will give the media and his detractors something to run with.

      Liked by 1 person

    • December 27, 2016 10:37 am

      If ge does attempt a pardon somehow, would she accept? She would have to admit to committing a crime and she insists that she has done nothing wrong.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. November 14, 2016 2:09 pm

    Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.

    Liked by 1 person

What do you think about it?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: