Terrorists, Facebook and Abortion
I can only shake my head in disgust whenever I read stuff like the following …
“Each of these attacks were carried out with a goal to spread fear and distrust, and turn members of a community against each other.”
The “only sustainable way to fight back” against these militants is to “create a world” where everyone “feels cared for and loved.”
So, getting this straight, the goal of Muslim terrorists who murder innocent people is to “spread fear and distrust.”
I have the tendency to disagree with that reasoning, as profound as it is. I’m kind of wondering who is going to create the world suggested by Mr. Zuckerberg? Him? Barack Obama?
Maybe Zuckerberg could run over to Syria, sit down with ISIS leaders and present his idea to them. I know he wouldn’t need it, but I’ll pay his air fare.
If Zuckerberg wants his fantasy world he’ll need to start by killing every terrorist world-wide. Muslim terrorists understand only one thing … violence. The violence perpetrated by them can be defeated only by extreme violence. People who target and slaughter women and children can’t be reasoned with. The more innocent people they kill, the happier they are, the more they rejoice. Death, destruction, hatred, misery and darkness are what ‘these attacks’ are all about and terrorists don’t give a damn about feeling “cared for and loved.”
Obama and his ilk continue to spout off b.s. against any one who is genuinely concerned about terror attacks. Regardless of how he and his fellow Muslim sympathizers try to deflect attention from the only group of people who own the exclusive rights of terrorism, it’s interesting that Obama is “hosting” leaders from about 50 countries for a nuclear security summit to address the real danger of an attack on a western city using nuclear materials, or targeting a nuclear reactor.
Lastly and surely least we have the abortion issue. Donald Trump who was interviewed by Chris Matthews was completely unprepared for what Matthews was going to present him with stepped “in it” badly. Now folks, in my view abortion is a non-issue. Don’t take me wrong. I’d love to see Roe v Wade overturned and abortion outlawed completely. But it ain’t gonna happen … ever. That friends is why it’s a non-issue. It’s the ‘law of the land’ regardless of what blithering liberals say. It was a court decision, not a legislative one in the Congress and a decision basically allowing it during the first three months of pregnancy. (not completely positive about that though) But, ‘it is what it is.’ Anyway, Matthews asked Trump that if abortion was outlawed should women who have them be punished.
Folks, this was a hypothetical question which Trump should have called Matthews on. I find it amazing that Republicans allow themselves to be sucked into such foolishness by these stark-raving liberals.
However, sanctimonious ‘conservatives’ used this foolishness to continue their lame attacks on Trump, citing liberal media entities … go figure!
I really think we have a lot of real issues we’re facing as a nation that need to be addressed before we take on the fantasy world of liberals.
Lets go back to the basic argument of your typical liberal for abortion. Rape, incest and if the life of the mother is in danger. I think we should have made a deal with the liberals … ban all abortions except for only in those cases. Naturally, they would never have taken the deal because their goal was abortion on demand, and there’s way too much money for Planned Parenthood to give up in death business.
Give into a liberal and … well, have you ever heard of an inch = a mile?