Skip to content

Hillary says that Muslims have “nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.” She’s lying.

November 22, 2015

This article I found over at Town Hall illustrates why Hillary Clinton won’t be the next president. Well, lets put it like this; if anyone can believe the utter nonsense spewed by her and her ilk then perhaps she’ll get some votes. A person has to be a complete moron or in such a state of denial that they’re willing to commit suicide similar to what we’ve been doing the last seven years by electing someone identical to her. I hope folks understand that the things Obama and Hillary want us to believe will get us killed and destroy the United States.


Via: Town Hall

Hillary: Muslims ‘Have Nothing Whatsoever To Do With Terrorism’


Behold, the woman who shall soon be crowned Queen of the endlessly self-righteous and self-congratulatory “Reality Based Community:”

Hillary Clinton


“Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

This is pure claptrap.  Everyone understands that the West is not at war with Islam broadly, and that an overwhelming percentage of Muslims reject violent extremism.  It’s been beaten into our heads by politicians of all stripes since 9/11, and we’re generally bright enough to draw the relevant distinction: “These Muslims over here are just peaceful, faithful people living their lives, whereas those Muslims over there are radical and seek to impose a toxic strain of their faith via terror and violence. We have no quarrel with the former group, which thankfully represents the large majority; the latter group must be confronted and defeated.”  This dynamic isn’t hard.  It can be quickly and easily explained, yet we are constantly bombarded with dumb, sanitized denialism like Hillary’s second sentence above. Instead of treating us like adults, we’re infantilized.  And to what end?  Muslims are peaceful and tolerant, we’re instructed, and they have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.  This last bit is insultingly preposterous.  Some Muslims have quite a lot to do with terrorism, actually.  Like the ones who were led by their hardcore theology to kill 3,000 people on 9/11.  Or blow up trains in Spain.  Or target London’s public transit system with bombs.  Or slaughter students at a Kenyan university.  Or Devastate a nightclub in Indonesia.  Or shoot up a shopping mall in Nairobi.  Or lay siege to a hotel in Mumbai.  Or terrorize Nigerian schoolgirls. Or, you know, take hostages in Mali. I could go on for some time.  But those aren’t real Muslims, our Thought Leaders inform us.  Islamists loudly beg to differ — and wouldn’t they know a lot more about their motives and religious teachings than Western purveyors of bumper sticker feel-goodery? Try this: Ask someone who’s convinced jihadists shouldn’t be considered Muslims whether or not Osama bin Laden’s corpse should have been discarded with no regard for Islamic traditions.  Or whether the terrorists at Gitmo should be deprived of prayer mats, or Halal meals, or Korans.  Maybe some enterprising reporter will ask Hillary these questions someday.  In any case, the “nothing to do with terrorism” line is plainly nonsense.  The more difficult part is the “peaceful and tolerant” phrase.  It’s absolutely true that a huge preponderance of Muslims worldwide abhor and reject religious violence.  But as I explored in a piece after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, there is a worrisomely sizable strain of abject illiberalism that runs through mainstream Islam. Data from Pew, a respected global pollster, gathered two years ago:


I have to admit that I cannot get a grasp on why western nations are begging for migrants from the Middle East and East Africa to come into their countries. Canada is gearing up to take in 25,000 Syrian “refugees” within the next six weeks. Why? Why would the Prime Minister of Canada put Canadian citizens at risk? That’s precisely what he’s doing. That’s what Obama is doing. It’s not even a “gamble” or a “roll of the dice.” It’s a sure thing that active terrorists will be amongst the refugees and innocent people are going to be killed. So, again, why? The only logical explanation I can come up with is the leader of Canada is compromised, bought. Now, Obama I can understand why he wants the migrants. He hates America and Americans. Hillary, I know she’s been bought. That’s how the Clintons roll. I hope there are enough Americans liberal and conservative who have enough sense to see the eminent danger of welcoming Muslims by the thousands from the Middle East and will keep Hillary far away from the White House.

10 Comments leave one →
  1. November 22, 2015 9:39 am

    The problem with Islam is that Islam is both a religion and a political system. The political system that Islam requires is incompatible with our religion and political beliefs. That political system is theocratic, it exists to promote Islam and destroy any opposition.

    Because Islam does not tolerate religious freedom, any people that wants religious freedom must stop Muslims at its borders. So long as we are the stronger, we can trade with Muslims, but we must accept the fact that that if they have sufficient power and numbers they will not allow us to keep our religious beliefs.

    Look at any country that has a Muslim majority population. Where is there any example of religious tolerance? Look at what Muslims are doing in countries where their numbers are growing. Don’t they demand Sharia law? Sharia law is not compatible with the type of governments that now exist in the West, and it is simply ridiculous to assume otherwise.

    So why do our leaders want more Muslims? Sometime people are too devious for their own good. Our leaders suffer the delusion that they can control the Muslim refugees by pitting them against us and us against them. Yet the divisions they are producing are too unstable — too hostile. Instead of being docile, these Muslims have their own agenda and their own leadership. When the Muslim immigrants sense they have the numbers, Muslim leaders will discard our leaders as traitorous and untrustworthy. Then lots of heads will be separated from their bodies. Therefore, if want to avoid this impending disaster, we need to replace our leaders now.

    Liked by 1 person

    • November 22, 2015 9:59 am

      Excellent comment Citizen Tom. Oh, it’s good to ‘see’ you again and I hope all is well with you and yours.
      I think the American people really need to wake up to the incompatibility of Middle Eastern culture and western culture. Like you stated Sharia Law and any (for the sake of argument) democratic society cannot exist peacefully together. Our Constitution and Sharia Law are completely opposite in ideology.
      I believe our so-called leaders are and have been using the Islamists to further their nefarious agendas at least since 9/11/2001. And as you said they’ll eventually lose their heads for it.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. November 22, 2015 10:09 am

    First of all I think “Citizen Tom” is right on the money and I would really like permission to copy and re-publish his comment ver-batim with a few observations of my own thrown in ….

    Secondly, Mz. Clinkton is correct in one respect: The “Peaceful” Muzzle-ums are definitely tolerant people and probably don’t have anything to do with terrorism but the radical Muzzle-ums who are addicted to terrorism are still Muzzle-ums but it’s just that they have a different way of interpreting Islam —- but both Peaceful Muzzle-ums and Radical Mussle-ums are still both “Muzzle-ums regardless and the problem we face as enablers of refugees and immy-grunts en masse is to try to figure out which is which so that the twin do not mix and subdue us all with their numbers — and their butcher knives. I like to remind myself that wherever there are no Muzzle-ums there tends to be no terrorism — or at least there is less than there is where the Reeligiun Uv Peece has esconced itself substantially.

    Then I have to ask myself, “Why is the entire History of the ideology so filled with violence and war and conquest and enslavement and butchery? If you follow the History you will find that perhaps at least a few (dozen, hundred, thousand, million) of them have been both Muzzle-um and warlike and that acts of butchery such as we are familiar with in our modern is nothing new on the scene but has been active in History and simmering beneath the surface because of the basic precepts of the ideology until just about the time of 2000 – 2008 and further on.

    So in conclusion I think I could believe: (A) Peaceful Muzzle-ums have nothing to do with terrorism and (B) Radical Muzzle-ums have everything to do with terrorism and the problem is tryi8ng to sort out which is which but … by any standard … both are indeed Muzzle-um because both are raised in the same tradition and learn the same lessons from the same operational books and Fat-wahs — and whatever.

    I think some of our politicolinamuses are playing a little shell game with our credulity sometimes for the sake of the PC Police and the attendant agenda …. whatever that might be.

    Liked by 1 person

    • November 22, 2015 12:50 pm

      You are more than welcome to use Citizen Tom’s comment John. I think you’re correct about the modern history thing. Yeah, there was the Inquisition a few centuries ago. But I tinker we’ve overcome that. It’s today that’s important.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. the unit permalink
    November 22, 2015 9:49 pm

    You go down lying with the devil and globalists, you wake up with sleaze. 🙂


  4. the unit permalink
    November 23, 2015 1:17 pm

    More Clinton mantra. Bill couldn’t take out OBL as no evidence of criminal charges. Well, what’s keep Hillary and Foundation from being taken out?


What do you think about it?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: