A rant by Steve …
I just went to lunch and on the way to pick up something savory, I was thinking about liberals. Trust me I feel like a have a problem with self-flagellation but what can I say. Anyway I can’t help but wonder what makes them so down right hateful? Naturally their thing is that conservatives and Republicans are hateful. We’re hateful because we don’t like the things Obama and company are doing to America. We see he’s a fraud and we don’t particularly like that. Now we all know that as a human being we don’t hate Mr. Obama … but his perpetual lying and abuse of power is difficult to stomach. Then liberals will do the “What about Bush” song and dance … completely childish and asinine at best, but consider the source. On this blog there is more than enough Bush bashing and even conservative and Republican bashing to go around.
But I was thinking about your typical liberal. A while back I wrote Liberals Use Stupidity To Win An Argument … and what I wrote in that piece is more evident today than it was back then. Liberals are completely void of the ability to reason intelligently, to present a valid point in any dialogue what so ever.
For example, the other day I wrote another piece proclaiming why I dislike Hillary Clinton. The reasons have nothing to do with her appearance (though she does have a face only a mother could love). I simply said I don’t like her because she’s corrupt. I provided multiple links clearly demonstrating her life-time of scandals and corruption. Even if half were false accusations there is more than enough to lock her a$$ up for the rest of her days. You can read that piece and realize there is not one mention of her running against a Republican for president and that I’d vote for the Republican. Only the pointing out of her unsavory life. She’s not fit to even be running for president in, if it comes to that in my opinion, but I digress a little.
There’s a saying in the Bible, actually two scriptures in particular, two back-back verses which read:
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
As always with every post here at Cry and Howl I can find some liberal using my stuff to get ideas for something they write. In response to my rant about Hillary’s corrupt life one liberal actually wrote:
Why I Like Hillary for 2016:
Because I think she would be a far far far better candidate than anyone the Right Wing can come up with – – and that’s all the reason I need.
I can’t even answer such asinine reasoning. First, Hillary isn’t a far far better candidate than anyone on the Left-wing or Right-wing. And again, I didn’t even mention an opponent for Mrs. Clinton.
For the liberal, you don’t worry that a corrupt individual such as Mrs. Clinton could/would do immense harm to the United States, just as long as a liberal wins the election. This demonstrates the hatred for anything decent in America and for America herself that some one knowing how corrupt a person is to be willing to sellout the nation for such an asinine reason.
I’ve blocked some liberals from commenting on this site because of their arrogance and their argumentative nature. Cry and Howl has been on left-wing blog rolls and I’ve requested it’s removal because I can’t bring myself to even associate with such blind stupidity. I say “blind stupidity” because when a liberal posts something like what I mentioned or when they write that it’s better to kill new-born babies than to have it be possibly raised in a poor family they get “likes” from their 2 or 3 readers … at least as ignorant and hateful as the author. I mean tell me if it’s love that would motivate someone to make a statement like that or like “women need these kinds of services” in response to the horrors in which Kermit Gosnell was involved? Sick, sick people.
I was listening to the radio yesterday while driving to the store. The host was talking about how Mr. Obama, in his infinite wisdom and care for the U.S. economy delayed the Keystone Pipeline again until after the November elections. (nothing political about that!) Now I’ve read all the certified b.s. written by liberals who never do anything except repeat what they’ve heard from other liberals equally if not more ignorant than the other. “It will harm the environment.” “It won’t create but just a few jobs.” “It would only create more oil for China,” and other stupid stuff only liberals can concoct in their little minds.
Not one of those intellectually challenged liberals have or will take the time to seek the facts about the Keystone Pipeline and the benefits during and after the construction of it. First, The State Department’s final environmental impact statement concludes
Cumulative impacts associated with the proposed Project and connected actions vary among individual environmental resources and locations. Generally, where long-term or permanent impacts from the proposed Project are absent, the potential for additive cumulative effects with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects is negligible.
Keystone’s CMRP and planned mitigation measures, individual federal and state agency permitting conditions, and/or existing laws and regulations would, if permitted, work to control potential impacts and reduce the proposed Project’s contribution to cumulative effects.
I just read a lot of the State Departments 44 page impact statement and I have to say it is quite exhaustive. They’ve covered every conceivable scenario and what negative impact the construction and operation of the Keystone Pipeline would include. I mean everything from Greenhouse emissions, to water-ways, to the differing plant and animal and even insects which would be impacted at all. They held meetings with Indian tribes, considered potential spills, included a history of other pipelines, and the economic benefits for the different states and local communities. Click on the above link and you’ll see what I mean. Here are the facts regarding the job creation potential …
Economic Activity Overview
During construction, proposed Project spending would support approximately 42,100 jobs (direct, indirect, and induced), and approximately $2 billion in earnings throughout the United States. Of these jobs, approximately 3,900 would be direct construction jobs in the proposed Project area in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Kansas (3,900 over 1 year of construction, or 1,950 per year if construction took 2 years). Construction of the proposed Project would contribute approximately $3.4 billion (or 0.02 percent) to the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). The proposed Project would generate approximately 50 jobs during operations. Property tax revenue during operations would be substantial for many counties, with an increase of 10 percent or more in 17 of the 27 counties with proposed Project facilities.
The jobs and earnings analysis recognizes three distinct components of economic activity and job creation: direct, indirect, and induced.
- Direct economic activity associated with construction includes all jobs and earnings at firms that are awarded contracts for goods and services, including construction, directly by Keystone.
- Indirect economic activity includes all goods and services purchased by these construction contractors in the conduct of their services to the proposed Project. Examples of these types of activities related to pipeline construction include the goods and services purchased to produce inputs such as concrete, fuel, surveying, welding materials, and earth-moving equipment.
- Induced economic activity includes the spending of earnings received by employees working for either the construction contractor or for any supplier of goods and services required in the construction process. Examples of induced activities include spending by access road construction crews, welders, employees of pipe manufacturers, and ranchers providing beef for restaurants and construction camps.
The bottom line is the negative effect of building the pipeline is next to nothing and the benefits to the United States in nearly every aspect is tremendous.
Via: The Foundary
Opponents of the project have also taken to minimizing the job numbers, saying that the pipeline will create only “a handful” of permanent jobs—and that’s correct. But that argument also dismisses the tens of thousands of construction jobs that the pipeline project will create. In fact, simply building the southern portion—which didn’t need the President’s approval—has already created 4,000 construction jobs. Further, Keystone XL also will add economic value, can be built without taxpayer assistance, will result in billions of dollars of tax revenue for the states through which it runs, and will provide a stable supply of oil.
With high economic benefits and minimal environmental impact, this project should be a no-brainer. But this is not the first time the president has made a statement on Keystone XL and then did nothing. In four short months it will be six years (yes, six) since TransCanada first submitted its application to the Department of State to build Keystone XL.
When the administration first delayed the project they announced a decision would be made by the end of 2011. Was that deadline met? Nope. President Obama punted until after the 2012 elections and here we are again, with the mid-term elections approaching, and apparently it’s fourth and long again. So it’s time to punt. Again.
Nah, Mr. Obama clearly demonstrates by his actions that he’s against anything and everything that’s good for America. Even a bunch of Democrats in the Congress have been pushing to get this done …
I found this perfect example of how liberals and Democrats view three major incidences.
Via: The Minority Report
How Democrats View Benghazi vs. Fort Hood vs. Bundy Ranch Illustrated by 3 Pictures
This sums up how Democrats think about three incidents, two extremely violent and one not violent at all (not counting the tasing and vehicular pushing by Federal Agents). But guess which one of these events is classified as “domestic terrorism” by Democrats?
I had this saved in drafts and wasn’t going to post it. I’m sick of the Obamas and was just going to leave it alone, but I changed my mind.
Regardless of how liberals and the media feel about the “royal couple”, Michelle Obama is not held in such high esteem …
I’m just going to put the title to a piece from Yahoo News with a paragraph or so … and then copy and paste the first few comments coming from regular people …
WASHINGTON (AP) — Michelle Obama said “splurging is the key to life” if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries.
“How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?” she asked. “You couldn’t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries.”
Now check out the comments …
Uhm.. WHY is Her/ My Thighness™ wearing tight pants?
Spandex, spandex-like clothing is a privilege not a right.
The ONLY people who can pull off spandex are teen-20-something Eastern Europe ballet dancers, ice skaters. Serious track, cross country aforementioned aged girls.
Not some 50-year old dumpy woman who was/ is greasy spoon chef Paula Deen’s BIGGEST behind-the-scenes eater of her now-debunked show.
Lastly it’s REEEEAL EEEEAAASY to ‘splurge’ when you & your girly-man husband have been lifelong federally employed/ private sector stealing underwhelming, self-serving chodes.
Well here we are starting another week and I had to start it off with a good laugh so I visited some liberal web sites. Funny, funny stuff. One liberal thinks that Jesus is just like him! You know, a lover of perversion. There’s no act, no matter how sick or depraved that isn’t acceptable and embraced by the liberals and … Jesus, according to some very sick individuals. I guess we’ll see soon enough just what Jesus considers acceptable behavior.
I have a fault, which is I’ll highlight different topics in one piece. The reason I do that is I generally get to the “meat of the matter” rather quickly. I can’t write long, drawn out articles, because first, I don’t like reading them and second, I think a writer should be able to make his/her point relatively quickly. You know, “if you can’t strike oil in 20 minutes, stop drilling.” Most of my stuff can be read in just a few minutes. If I think of other stuff to put in a post and if they wouldn’t make the thing too lengthy, I’ll include them. There’s a lot of stuff to write about and I think it’s cool to include a comment or two about different stuff in the same post. That’s just me.
Moving on, I posted Barack’s Lying and Hillary’s Corruption … UPDATED a few days ago. Now, we find out that there’s $6 BILLION unaccounted for in State Department funds, or in the words of Hillary Clinton … “misplaced” at the time she was Secretary of State. I contend that Mrs. Hillary Clinton is corrupt. I believe she is probably the most corrupt person ever to be considered as a presidential candidate. Liberals make a big deal out of her appointment to Secretary of State by Barack Obama. (like he didn’t owe her something) One of the points of the aforementioned piece was to acknowledge the fact that even she could not name one single accomplishment or achievement especially during her years as Secretary of State. That folks is a fact. Not an accusation of a “Hillary hater”. That piece was instantly attacked, and in the most hilarious and asinine way “debunked”. The “debunking” piece at the left-wing rag, Daily Kos, the article was … and I’m spelling it letter for letter … Hillary’s Otstanding Accomplishments.
Again, as I pointed out, regardless of the title there wasn’t one accomplish mentioned at all for the period of time as Secretary of State. The only accomplishments highlighted was that she was born into a upstanding family and she was smart in school. Okay, forgive me, according to the piece at the Daily Kos, Hillary’s greatest achievement was staying with Bill when he was caught lying to the American people about Monica.
Now for the benefit of liberals who are literally the dumbest people on the planet; I don’t dislike Hillary Clinton for no reason or on general grounds. I dislike her and her sick-ass husband because they are corrupt. I dislike Bill Clinton for being a sexual predator and a liar. HERE are some other reasons. A dumbass liberal said basically that because Hillary was voted as the “most admired” person a while back that “the vast majority of the people had spoken.” Forgive my use of unsavory language here folks but I cannot stand an ignorant, dumb s.o.b. whose IQ is lower than his/her shoe size. The “most admired” person in a survey of about 1062 people and Hillary got 15% of the vote. That’s it. Uh, hey dick-weed, 15% of 1062 isn’t a “vast majority” of anything.
HERE are some reasons I don’t like Hillary and know that she is corrupt. Her entire life has been one of corruption and lies. If you want to see some of Hillary’s “accomplishments” click RIGHT ABOUT HERE.
Okay, I’ve got to lighten up this morning. My a$$ is really chapped that liberals keep coming to old Cry and Howl seeking topics they believe can be “debunked” through mind-less drivel which has no bearing on what’s written here. So, I’m just going to take a little time from the chaos and just kind of … well … “groove” …
Hoping all my friends have a safe and blessed Easter weekend.
The mid-term elections are approaching and it appears the Democrat party will once again get spanked pretty hard. All the boasting about the success of Obamacare rings hollow on most Americans, especially considering that 60% of the people believe Obama lies on very important issues. I mean this guy’s lying is probably what he’ll be known best for … besides Benghazi, IRS scandal, the phony Bin Laden murder, the murders of the Navy SEALs, the murder of American citizens via drone strikes, his endless golf outings and vacations, the Rap concerts in the White House, his race baiting, his bowing to those who hate America, his love for perversion and his disdain for America.
Personally I don’t see one reason to believe a word that Barack Obama says. For sure the various world leaders know he’s a joke. Oh well, at least America made history and elected a black man and a gay one at that, as president, kind of like a ‘two-fer’ on the making history thing.
So next up we’ll get to elect another even more corrupt individual, if you can imagine that. Hillary Clinton is being touted by the major media and Democrats as the front runner by a wide margin for the presidential election in 2016. Now this person has more scandal baggage than anyone in modern times, which defines her entire life. Heck, even as First Lady she was under criminal investigation. Geez, what a gal! But she’s one of these power freaks who never goes away. The media is doing it’s best to drag her a$$ over the finish line for the presidency. One problem is that no one can think of a single accomplishment she’s achieved, even as Secretary of State. Well, she did rack up more frequent-flyer miles than any other Secretary of State. Being in charge of the State Department she was also directly responsible for the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans at Benghazi … she did say that she was responsible, but we’re still waiting for Barack to hold someone accountable. Well Hillary’s been naughty again because now there’s another little problem that’s nipping at the heels of the former Secretary of State …
Via: Western Journalism
Bombshell Report Links Hillary Clinton To Missing State Department Billions…
The amount of money missing is staggering…
According to an Inspector General’s report, a staggering $6 billion dollars in State Department funds is missing—“misplaced,” in the words of Hillary Clinton. In one case, Hillary Clinton wrote a $50 million check for “services performed.” The paperwork for what exactly the “services performed” were has also been “misplaced.” Just for the Iraq Embassy in Bagdad, a staggering $2 billion is missing! Obama’s response to Hillary Clinton “misplacing” $6 billion dollars?
“What difference does it make!”
But Hillary Clinton has bigger problems than a few billion dollars missing: It has now come out that her 2008 presidential campaign was illegally funded by businessman Jeffrey Thompson, with Clinton crony and former DNC chief Minyon Moore pulling the strings.
But there’s more: court documents show that Thompson illegally funded dozens of campaigns—and guess who he supported in 2012? You guessed it: Barack Hussein Obama.
Over at the Daily Kos … yeah, the gathering place for liberals to get their daily dose of certified left-wing bullshit; you know, like flies gathering around the smell of dung, there’s an article “debunking” my piece. Someone didn’t appreciate my highlighting of the former first b#tch, Hillary Clinton and how utterly corrupt she is, and how even she couldn’t name a single accomplishment as Secretary of State during a recent interview.
The piece at the Daily Kos is entitled Hillary’s Otstanding Accomplishments (sic) (The dumbasses can’t even spell ‘outstanding’ correctly). In short the piece is about 15 paragraphs about how Hillary was an exceptional child with a keen intellect, and that she was a good student. As you continue reading the piece you begin to wonder when the author is going to reveal the list of great achievements, especially the ones while she was Secretary of State.
There aren’t any, none, nada, zilch, zero, nothing, not one at all. In fact, the following is listed at the Daily Kos as Hillary’s greatest accomplishment:
Perhaps Hillary’s greatest accomplishment … in effect, made a mockery of the culture of Republican machismo in Washington when she refused to produce a soap opera-like reaction to revelations of Willy’s philandering.
What a joke! Hillary’s greatest accomplishment was to stay married to her perverse, sexual predator of a husband.