Skip to content

90% of N.Y. gun owners refuse to register guns

April 15, 2014

Despite the best efforts, or at least the latest efforts of the anti-gun folks, even New Yorkers are defying the gun-grabbing freaks.

Via: Conservative Tribune

BREAKING: 90% of NY Gun Owners Refuse to Register Guns

Not unlike what’s happening in Connecticut right now, New York gun owners are refusing registration, blatantly defying the state’s unconstitutional new gun control law, called the NY SAFE Act.

We recently reported how gun owners in New York burned at least a thousand registration forms in defiance of the law.  We also noted that police are refusing to enforce it, as sheriffs in other states like Colorado and Connecticut that have new gun control laws are doing.

According to new figures leaked by sources inside the New York State Police, as many as 90% of gun owners may have refused to register their “assault weapons,” as only 3,000-5,000 guns have been registered so far.  The deadline to register is April 15.


Another good cop story …

April 15, 2014

There are more than enough stories of police brutality and videos of cops assaulting handcuffed folks, etc. I don’t think we show enough about good and caring officers who really are in the majority … Watch this short video about a compassionate Texas cop.


April 15, 2014

I believe the pause in action concerning the Bundy family and the Feds in Nevada could be a calm before the real storm happens. Anyone familiar with the strong armed tactics of those of team Obama know they ain’t going away. They are simply gearing up, lawyering up and figuring out how to overrun the Bundy family and rip them off for their cattle and land. Now that Harry Reid and the Feds have been caught and embarrassed, they’re not going to just go away. This only gives them more reason to squash the Bundys.


Via: WND
Warning follows threat from Harry Reid that grazing dispute ‘not over’

The executive director of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association says his sources inside the federal government warn that Washington’s weekend retreat in a dispute over grazing land in Nevada was only a move to distract attention and diffuse tensions, because a raid on the family’s ranch still is planned.

And there probably would be violence involved, said Richard Mack, the former sheriff of Graham County, Ariz.

“I don’t think it would be possible” to launch a raid without violence, he told WND Monday. “I don’t think the Bundys would lie down and be taken.”

He cited the vow by Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., that the confrontation was far from over, despite the weekend’s retreat by armed gunmen working for federal agencies.

Reid on Monday told KRNV-TV in Reno: “It’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.”


Mack, a longtime sheriff, told WND that Reid’s statements are beyond the pale.

“That kind of stupidity, where he puts federal regulations and policies of bureaucrats ahead of a family in his state that has done no wrong or committed a crime,” Mack said.

He charged that it is Reid who is destroying his own state’s ranching industry as well as the U.S. Constitution. The sheriff chided the senator for making statements about abiding by laws.

“Isn’t that amazing? The biggest crook in Washington,” Mack said.



ALERT: Sources inside BLM, Las Vegas Metro say Feds are Planning a Raid on Bundy Home

April 15, 2014

ALERT: Sources inside BLM, Las Vegas Metro say Feds are Planning a Raid on Bundy Home.


Will a ‘false flag’ event be in store for the Bundy Family? Harry Reid says it isn’t over.

April 14, 2014

I’m sure most people know what a “false flag” event is. For those that don’t know it’s when a simulated event is being staged in close proximity to an event that turns out to be real in the effort to cast confusion and doubt as to if it’s really happening. On 9/11/2001 scenarios were being staged of jets flying into buildings … while the real thing was going on. The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was being staged in another school a couple of miles from the alleged actual shooting. (odd that there wasn’t any lawsuits)

It’s nothing new that those in government are more than willing to sacrifice a few to push the cause of “the greater good” … that “greater good” being more government control.

With the standoff in Nevada between the BLM and the Bundy family being held off for the time being there were some who felt a false flag event would produce the desired results, albeit at the price of a multitude of innocent people being killed …


Sheriff wanted humans slaughtered at Bundy ranch!

According to this newly released video report by roypotterqa, Sheriff Gillespie in Nevada was attempting to set up a false flag leading to the slaughter of countless BLM officers in order for the US government to crack down on Bundy Ranch supporters. Gillespie, who sits on the board of the notorious hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center and is deeply involved with the Department of Homeland Security, WANTED BLM agents massacred to institute more tyrannical controls over the American people. Sheriff Gillespie can be reached at (702) 828-3111.



And then we have Harry Reid … “Well, it’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.” HARRY REID
I fear the government has gotten so brazen they don’t care anymore if the American people realize they are out of control. They know there isn’t much the public can do.

BLM: “The door isn’t closed. We’ll figure out how to move forward with this.”

April 14, 2014


The victory Cliven Bundy and his family experienced when the BLM and the National Park Service ceased rounding up Bundy’s cattle and pulled out the other day will be short lived. I felt this was just a smoke screen and that the Feds were simply going to come after the Bundys and their cattle and property from a different angle. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal

BLM spokesman Craig Leff told the Associated Press the agency would continue to try to resolve the matter involving rancher Cliven Bundy and the $1 million in owed grazing fees “administratively and judicially.”

“The door isn’t closed. We’ll figure out how to move forward with this,” he said, adding that the BLM did not participate in the negotiation moderated by Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie that deescalated tensions on Saturday.

“The BLM and National Park Service did not cut any deal and negotiate anything,” Leff said. “There was no deal we made.”

The government wants this land and now that they’ve had a minor set-back they’ll figure out how to muscle their way back in. If they persist in claiming Bundy owes the $1 million, I suspect they’ll simply put out a warrant for his arrest and send armed agents to arrest him.

Rest assured it isn’t over and won’t be until the government gets what it wants. Know those within the government are not above making “accidents” happen … and those “accidents” seem to happen much more frequently to those opposing the present administration.


Thanks to

Don’t think for a second the Feds are giving up …

The Liberal Way Of Thinking

April 14, 2014

I occasionally visit liberal web sites and I promise, if you want to take a trip to the Outer Limits or Twilight Zone give them a try. You’ll come away with the realization that liberals cannot be reasoned with. Their brains cannot process genuine common sense, nor are they capable of rational reasoning. Presenting facts and explaining any topic clearly as such that a child can understand is beyond their mental reasoning capacity. I know how this sounds but what I’m saying (writing in this case) is entirely accurate.

Liberals believe their way of thinking is too “complex” for conservatives to comprehend. Like, Barack Obama will tell them “You can keep your insurance policies if you like them.”  When their insurance policies are cancelled, Obama didn’t lie to them because their insurance policies were lousy anyway, even though they liked them … or something.

To a liberal requiring a photo ID for all voters is suppressing the vote of poor people and minorities. Now in the mind of a liberal, only Democrat voters are poor and or a minority ie. black or an illegal alien. Even when the same rules apply to Republicans and conservatives … only Democrats experience hardship.

For a liberal requiring identification for simple confirmation that a person is whom they claim to be is a hardship. Poor people can’t get to the DMV or have computers or are too old to obtain identification. That’s discriminatory. However poor people are required to sign up for Obamacare via computer, telephone or in person. When presented with the same problems for the poor … they may not have a computer or a telephone or might be infirm or too old to drive … Obamacare should be considered equally if not more ‘racist’ and or discriminatory to poor folks and minorities when the same logic is applied. Alas! Not to a liberal.

Anyway, John Hawkins over at Right Wing News does a good job in explaining why liberals are precisely what they accuse others of being.

Via: Right Wing News

10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Don’t Understand

“It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.” — Ronald Reagan

1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people’s ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being “open-minded” as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don’t even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?

2) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don’t belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can’t be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.

3) Fairness: In all fairness, I must admit that fairness is an arbitrary concept. So, you could make the argument that no one could get “fairness” wrong. Still, liberals do because they don’t make any effort to actually “be fair.” As a practical matter, liberals define “fairness” as taking as much as possible from people who they don’t think are going to vote for them and giving it to people who may vote for them in return for their ill gotten largesse. Certainly conservatives, libertarians, and moderates might disagree about how much money to take from the wealthy to redistribute to the poor or how to help the disadvantaged, but the only liberal answer to the question, “How much is enough?” is “more.”

4) Greed: To a liberal, believing that you pay too much in taxes or even opposing paying more in taxes is greedy. In actuality, wanting to loot as much money as possible that someone else has earned to use for your own purposes, which is what liberals do, is a much better example of greed.

5) Hate: Liberals often define simple disagreement with them on issues like gay marriage, tax rates, or abortion as hatred. No matter how well a position is explained, or the logical underpinnings behind it, it’s chalked up to hate. Meanwhile, the angriest, most vicious, most hateful people in all of politics are liberals railing against what they say is “hatred.” This irony is completely lost on the Left.



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 388 other followers

%d bloggers like this: