One would think that after the last seven years of watching the demise of the United States at the hands of Barack Hussein Obama that conservatives would at least locate their man-hoods to make sure they still have a pair. Over at Bad Blue I saw two conservative blog site owners get their panties in a wad over the latest “insults” from Donald Trump directed at Megyn Kelly. I mean come of folks, Ms. Kelly brought whatever wrath Mr. Trump can dish out on herself. Yet the writers over at SOOPERMEXICAN and Jammie Wearing Fools felt a call to arms, acting like their Tampons were filling up on a heavy flow day, because Trump tweeted a couple lame insults towards Megyn Kelly. You can click on those links if you feel like bothering to read the ridiculous blistering and limp-wrist comments these guys (I think ‘guys’) have directed towards Trump. Geez, America is burning to the ground and folks are getting their little feelings hurt over something tweeted about Megyn Kelly.
What chaps my ass is these are supposed to be conservative bloggers and they’re showing their indignation towards one of the only two or three Republicans who’ll tell the truth about anything. It’s enough the Republicans will and are already getting hammered by the liberal media, but have to deal with offended conservative bloggers.
There’s a new poll … I know … who cares? The Monmouth University Poll has Donald Trump at 30% with Ben Carson in 2nd place with 15% in the S.C. GOP field. If you’re wondering why, it’s because a great number of Americans are fed up with lying, panty-waist politicians who promise one thing and do the opposite. We’ve sat back and watched Obama and company open the flood gates to tens of thousands of illegal aliens, their children and among them thousands of criminals. They are sucking the life out the United States through their inability to contribute anything of value, yet demanding welfare, free medical care, subsidized housing, free education, etc. Americans are sick of people who can’t contribute to the benefit of their own third world countries, coming here to take advantage of a ‘better life’ of which they haven’t done anything to help make it better. I found an article which reveals the real cost of illegals and “anchor babies” to the American tax-payers.
Via: National Review
‘Peter and Ellie Yang,” the subjects of Benjamin Carlson’s fascinating new Rolling Stone essay, “Welcome to Maternity Hotel California,” paid $35,000 to have their second child in the United States. In 2012 Chinese state media reported 10,000 “tourist births” by Chinese couples in the United States; other estimates skew as high as 60,000. Following Donald Trump’s call for an end to birthright citizenship, and renewed attention on “anchor babies,” Carlson’s exposé on “birth tourism” seems to confirm that the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment works as a magnet for at least some parents across the globe. But just how big a magnet is it? According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.” The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday. Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening. According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.The short-term cost of “anchor babies” was revealed a decade ago in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. “‘Anchor babies’ born to illegal aliens instantly qualify as citizens for welfare benefits and have caused enormous rises in Medicaid costs and stipends under Supplemental Security Income and Disability Income,” wrote medical attorney Madeleine Pelner Cosman. She noted the increasingly costly situation in California:In 2003 in Stockton, California, 70 percent of the 2,300 babies born in San Joaquin General Hospital’s maternity ward were anchor babies, and 45 percent of Stockton children under age six are Latino (up from 30 percent in 1993). In 1994, 74,987 anchor babies in California hospital maternity units cost $215 million and constituted 36 percent of all Medi-Cal [California’s Medicaid program] births. Now  they account for substantially more than half.
I’ll bet most of the visitors here at C & H know when they are being had, ripped off, taken and scammed. The Obama’s abuse of “first family” perks has gotten so out of hand it smacks of … well … abuse and arrogance. Of course there are the usual left wing loons who attempt to demonstrate that G.W. Bush’s trips to Crawford, Texas exceeds in expense Barack’s and Michelle’s jaunts to Africa, China, England, Italy, Hawaii, etc. That my friends, is a joke and that joke is on us. Judicial Watch has, through the FOIA discovered that travel expenses alone the Obama’s and Joe Biden have racked up over $57 million. That doesn’t include any of the other stuff that goes along with the globe trotting freaks.
CHECK IT OUT RIGHT HERE … then bend over and grab your wallets.
We’ve all heard it said, “If it were me or you using a private server to send and received classified material, we’d already be in jail.” But we’re talking about Hillary Clinton, the favored person for the Democrat nomination to run for president. We all know she has lied, stalled, stonewalled, destroyed evidence, sold favors for millions of dollars, etc. etc. Well, she should take her rightful place in history, and it’s not as she thinks what’s owed to her (the presidency). She needs to swap her trade-mark ‘pant-suit’ in for an orange jumpsuit with “inmate” stenciled across the back.
Former CIA Director John Deutch did pretty much the same things as Hillary, except not on such a massive scale. Naturally this occurred under Bill’s administration and Janet Reno refused to prosecute Deutch, and Bill Clinton pardoned him on his last day in office.
Via: National Review
Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton insists she did nothing wrong by running all of her government communications, including classified material, through her unsecured, home-brewed computer server. Perhaps she’s forgotten one of her husband’s final acts in the Oval Office: issuing a presidential pardon to former CIA director John Deutch.
Deutch’s offense? Keeping classified material on unsecured home computers.
The pardon came just as Deutch was reportedly going to cop a plea with the Justice Department.
I made a comment the other day about regular folks like me being able to choose who is eligible to run for president and who isn’t. I basically said we don’t get to choose who gets to run for the Republican nomination, just like we didn’t get to choose Barack Obama’s as a candidate. At least one person vehemently disagreed with me. He said we do get to choose by refusing to vote for anyone we believe isn’t eligible because of their citizenship status.
I don’t want anyone as president who has dual loyalties … a little to America and a little towards the country of which they could be a citizen. This is the reason for the ‘natural-born citizen’ requirement for becoming president. We’ve had seven years of what having someone whose allegiance isn’t with the United States and where that’s gotten us. Ted Cruz’s citizenship is in question as to whether he’s eligible or not. Personally, I don’t know the origins of the natural born issue enough to make an argument, and I think it’s vain to do so. I believe we can look at Ted Cruz’s record and surmise that this guy definitely has America’s interests first and foremost and exclusively in mind. I detect no loyalty to Canada or Cuba and nothing he has done or said indicates that he has any interest beyond pulling the United States out of the sh#t hole Obama and company have created.
Having said that, I can see a confirmation of my point of us not being able to choose the candidates … for what ever reason. Right now the Republican Party is considering bumping Donald Trump from further debates even though his popularity is soaring among voters. To say we voters get to choose the candidates is ludicrous beyond throwing the election and getting another socialist/Marxist squatting in the White House. Yeah, it shouldn’t be that way, but when you’re in the belly of a whale, you’re going where the whale goes.
The Republican Party should let Trump continue on and beat him on their own records instead of eliminating him because they can’t overcome his popularity. The idea of excluding Trump is indicative of the attitude of the establishment Republican Party. “Forget what the voters want, we want so and so because he’s a ‘party first’ guy.”
So we could end up with Bush as the frontrunner. The amnesty for all illegals guy, and the king of Common Core.
Here’s an example of what Bush wants to educate our kids with …
If Mary has eight apples and Johnny has two dogs, what kind of car does Mary’s parents drive?
You can’t get the answer because Mary doesn’t really have eight apples … she has six pears, a cat and two gold fish.
As Jeb Bush tries to redefine himself, he’s having to struggle with coming to grips that a lot of folks don’t want another Bush, another establishment Republican along the likes of John Boehner and Mitch McConnell. Now, that could be a bit presumptuous considering Jeb was simply a state governor and not a national politician. You know, like his brother until he won the presidency.
I don’t think we need another Bush in the White House. As the saying goes, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. The Bush family has had their chances at doing something great for America and what did we get as a result? The Patriot Act. Massive debt. Massive government deficits. Not to mention a “broken immigration” system which has played right into the hands of the current occupier of the White House. And Jeb says, “We need to fix our broken immigration system for God’s sake!” Well Jeb, I for one don’t think you will do that. Jeb thinks simply granting amnesty for millions of illegals is the fix. I believe we went down that road before.
I sincerely believe Ted Cruz is the best man for the job. I know, I know, he might not be eligible becasue of his citizenship status.
Folks, we’re not the ones who get to decide that. Just like we didn’t get to decide whether Obama was eligible or not. If Cruz gets the nomination, he’ll have my absolute support and vote.
I have to say Donald Trump has brought back some dignity and genuine hope to us and America. We’ve been incredibly suffering under the heavy hand of Barack Obama’s massive power grabs and blatant disregard for the Constitution.
Trump at least has brought us back to the reality that the fat lady isn’t singing just yet over the United States. That there are people of influence and power, who given the opportunity, will protect America and faithfully execute the laws of the land.
One side note. While we’re focusing on the chaos being thrown at us with the Hillary thing and the Republican presidential contenders let’s not forget what next month is … be vigilant.
I found this at Clash Daily …
I know this is probably offensive to liberals. It’s just rude, insensitive and “racist.” (though “Muslims” are about as much of a “race” as Catholics). Anyway, Muslims have brought this attitude upon themselves. Okay, not all are terrorists. But you never hear them condemning the atrocities committed around the globe on a daily basis by Muslims. Oh, CAIR might put out a statement like, “We’re appalled by the beheading of 27 guys on a beach. But please understand the motivation behind the beheadings. ISIS members have no job opportunities and came from poor families. So this is happening because they feel sad and want to be heard.”
CLICK HERE for information of how Islam is making progress in the world … multiple dead bodies at a time.