Skip to content

Liberals, Obama and the Constitution

March 16, 2013

4638449079_obama_tearing_up_constitution_xlargeI have several posts within the bowels of Cry and Howl in which I penned my frustration when dealing with liberals. I visit left-wing blogs and occasionally read the major media regarding everything from abortion to the economy to gun control to voter fraud.  I think the most disturbing topic is how Barack Obama has clearly committed impeachable acts, high crimes and misdemeanors, yea felonies, but with liberals it’s cool. It’s okay, especially with liberals, to have a felon playing president. It’s okay especially with liberals to have a homosexual cocaine using fraud acting as president.

But I’m starting to stray off topic here. There is no denying that the Obama administration continually violates the Constitution and he committed perjury even taking the oath of office.  It’s taken me quite a while to come to grips as to why liberals are so accepting of every unconstitutional act Obama does.  How can he swear to protect and defend the Constitution which he said is “flawed”?  No one protects and defends something they deem as flawed. I mean the guy does such outrageous stuff one would think, “how is he getting away with it?”  Watergate was a joke in comparison to the stuff Obama pulls off daily. Iran/Contra?  Child’s play compared to what Obama has been doing in places like Benghazi, and all the nations he has facilitated the Muslim Brotherhood taking control of via Obama Spring … er … Arab Spring.

Senator Ted Cruz articulated outstanding questions to Dianne Feinstein regarding the Bill of Rights. He basically asked what gives Congress the right to pick and choose which ones they will allow Americans to enjoy. Feinstein offered up an arrogant and indignant response centered on her longevity in government. She lied to Mr. Cruz’s face when she said  “I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution.  I have great respect for it.” 

I had some email exchanges with a certain liberal and he contends the Constitution is out-dated and needs to be “done over”.  And …   the law of the land should be changed to fit contemporary requirements on nations and their peoples.   And …   there isn’t anyone out there today who is threatening to invade our country and to subject us to all the stuff that caused the first founding documents to be written.  These things aren’t needed anymore and we should be thinking about changing them or getting rid of them.  (funny stuff huh!!  the guy says “there isn’t anyone out there today threatening to invade our country” … I guess he missed this one and this one)

All this time I couldn’t get a grasp on why liberals love the America hating, Constitution shredding Obama. After reading the above it hit me … they love Obama because they are exactly like he is. The hate the Constitution. They want it done away with. They want “contemporary requirements on nations and their peoples”  … the global society … not a sovereign. Liberals and Barack Hussein and Dianne Feinstein loathe  a Constitution limiting the power of the federal government. Liberals want what the government will give them and the politicians want to be in control.  This is why Liberals get cocky and pee their panties with delight whenever Obama side steps the Congress and  makes his executive orders.

Of course liberals are good at lying. Just like Feinstein when she said she has “great respect” for the Constitution.

Obama, Feinstein, Harry Reid, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Nancy Pelosi and everyday liberals are nothing but swine. They want the Constitution to be “done-over” because they claim it’s flawed, yet they all claim to have great respect and admiration for it … you can’t have it both ways oinkers. You can’t break the laws of the land and not be a criminal. You can’t do unconstitutional acts and then swear to protect and defend the Constitution “so help me God”.  Personally Barack, I’d be a little more circumspect with what I uttered before God.

But anyway,  I got a little long here. The bottom line is liberals do know that Barry Hussein is breaking the law and committing crimes and unconstitutional acts … that is why they love him so much because they want the constitution done away with. It behooves them to be careful what they wish for.


About these ads
21 Comments leave one →
  1. March 16, 2013 3:25 pm

    It’s okay especially with liberals to have a homosexual cocaine using fraud acting as president. – – – – -(reply: And don’t forget the rest of the voters, millions of them, liberal, independent and conservative alike, who voted for him to be their president twice and yes, who are more than happy with his agenda – – so it is not just “Liberals” now is it? Why not present all the facts instead just a few?

    • March 16, 2013 3:46 pm

      You make my point John … they are happy with his agenda because they, you, dislike the Constitution as much as Barack.

    • March 16, 2013 4:13 pm

      And, as you know, if the People become dissatisfied with their government, they have the power to change it.

  2. March 16, 2013 3:35 pm

    The bottom line is liberals do know that Barry Hussein is breaking the law and committing crimes and unconstitutional acts … that is why they love him so much because they want the constitution done away with. It behooves them to be careful what they wish for. – – – – (Reply: This sounds exactly like what the nutwad Right Wing Extreme Revisionists in congress are working for and this is how we got the first version of Homeland Security . . . with some Conservatives suspending parts of the constitution, doing unconstitutional things and invading other countries under pretext of looking for weapons of mass destruction that were never there. This is why Texas school books have been revised to give them a “more conservative” slant and why the “Originalists” on the Right Side want to take us “Back” instead of “Forward.” It is the Conservatives who will manage to do away with the Constitution if people aren’t careful because it is the only way they will ever achieve what they have been wanting all along – – permanent control, permanent power so they can establish their religious theocratic oligarchy and have their two- class social order . . . the very rich being served by the very poor. Cut out the nonsense and smell the real roses.

    • March 16, 2013 4:17 pm

      You continue to reinforce everything I wrote.

    • March 16, 2013 7:04 pm

      Glad to be of service – – so what you are saying now is that you are agreeing with the Liberal point of view. Thank you. I figured that sooner or later you would come around.

  3. Jan permalink
    March 16, 2013 8:17 pm

    The voters who voted for him 2nd time around were either dead,
    duplicating votes, non-educated in any of the policies being
    instigated, (it’s amazing how many normal people, really
    down-to-earth nice moral people, do not KNOW any of the
    ramifications of what is transpiring right in front of their eyes
    on a daily basis),
    or these voters who were so loyal and faithful, truly are
    of another ideology, and want to destroy our republic.
    A case in point is the troll, Darren H. from all over the state
    of California. He is an uneducated black man, who writes
    the worst raunch about Dr. Taitz and ‘birthers’ and whose
    comments are constantly flagged, but he marches on with his
    embarrassing upbringing at the forefront.

    In other words, there were the above anomalies, along with
    rigged machines, more voters than registered in a town,
    and non-English, dysfunctional people who were told what
    do do and for whom to cast their ballot.

    On top of that were the millions of military ballots that
    so mysteriously went missing and some never were
    located, some arrived too late to count.

    Strange but very predictable.

    How does Obama rate a second chance to cause the decline
    of America?

    By underhanded means, with evil officials as his helpers,
    and perhaps???? a whole lot of mafia style courtesy.

    Looking at the petition to Congress, which is now 48,000
    and subtract about 300 of them for duplications and trolls,

    and you will see that the populace has come out of its
    mesmerized state of complacency. They first began to
    show some life when the Obamacare penalties/taxes
    and mandates to do or die, fell upon them like a
    guillotine. Then it was the arrest w/o trial and remain
    in prison forever, if you are perceived as a terrorist;

    after that came the very last straw which hit home
    like nothing else before… the decree of guns being
    unlawful and no longer allowed in a family’s home.
    Since then, several situations have revealed
    lives saved from the bad guys .. because the good
    guys/girls owned and used their weapons for defense.

    Does that stop Obama’s minions? Nope.. they are
    even more avid about the removal of what many
    men and a few outdoorsy women hold dear.

    their weapon of choice.

    By the way, I remember the Iraq scenario
    and I recall that they DID find weapons of mass
    destruction. It sort of see-sawed back and forth
    for awhile, but I believe there was verification.

    Nonetheless, one good thing that came out of
    that invasion was the release from dungeons of
    many helpless woman, children *yes, CHILDREN,
    and men, all because Hussein was a monster,
    and power-hungry. What a joy to see his capture
    and demise.

    We will feel the same joy when the monster now
    in the People’s White House and Oval Office,
    is taken out and hanged by his scrawny neck.

    New Year’s Eve will never match that celebration.

    And as for the whining liberals (there has to be
    a more accurate term for these miscreants)

    they will go down in history as the sorriest group
    of subversives ever to hit this land of the free
    and home of the brave.

    They dare to say that THEY BELONG HERE
    AND THE CONSERVATIVES should move on
    out to another country.

    Excuse me, but this land was not declared
    a land of liberty and justice for all
    for the likes of psychopaths who want to
    play Caesar or Nero and watch Rome burn.

    On the other hand, when the Lord Jesus
    comes to proclaim 1000 years of peace
    on Earth, all of this will be burned up and
    none of it will ever come to fruition again.

    All of mankind’s works .. good or evil
    will no longer become bones of contention.

    There will be no more Darren H. of Calif.
    no more traitorous judges, court clerks,
    lawyers, rich, greedy humans; no more
    industrial buildings, no more slums,
    no more crime, pornography, and human

    The liberals will no longer be able to
    spiel their lies and twisted facts.

    In fact, there will no longer be liberals
    or conservatives.

    Jesus will be the shepherd and
    we who love and follow, will be His sheep.

    Now that is a message to be learned
    by all listening, watching, lying liberals.

  4. Jan permalink
    March 16, 2013 8:41 pm

    I just read this article on Canada Free Press, about our elections fraud:
    On top of this revelation is that Hamilton County, OH is charging
    some voters for voting more than once,
    and in one area, there was 104% in voting numbers..
    great mathematics!!!
    To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.” Not in theory, but in reality.

    Such is the case today!

    A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many – many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.

    They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too…

    They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, “drive-by media” caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.

    But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up – make a silly mistake – overplay their hand – leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.

    Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It’s almost poetic…
    The Mistake

    Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?

    Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.

    Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the hen house, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too.
    The Evidence

    In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” document reads as follows, and I quote;

    “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
    Yes, I know…. there is a typo in there. Not my typo, it belongs to whoever prepared the official document at the DNC. Did you catch it?

    The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.

    However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document myself.

    Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these “certified” candidates on the ballot.

    The “Official Certification of Nomination” that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.

    But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;

    “- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

    The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;

    “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:

    Oops, another typo? The reference to Obama’s constitutional eligibility was missing… An accidental omission?

    The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” had been removed from the document sent to the states. And yes, I have a copy of this version of the DNC Official Certification of Nomination letter too!

    In fact, this version is in Election Commission files of all fifty state Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent the constitutional text.

    Just in case you are wondering, the answer is yes. This version also includes the same typo present in the version not submitted by the DNC, but including the constitutional text, which means both documents have the same place of origin.

    The individual at DNC headquarters who prepared this very important document was not only a poor typist… they were sloppy enough to leave both versions of the signed documents lying around.

    Now this is the stuff real conspiracies are made of!
    The Implications

    Please, allow me to connect the dots here…

    The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
    One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
    The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President.

    Oh, there is one more important document in this story.

    The RNC “Official Certification of Nomination” for John McCain and Sarah Palin reads, and I quote:

    “We do hereby certify that a national convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the Unites States, were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz;”

  5. March 17, 2013 5:46 am

    I hope the Secret Service has had an opportunity to read this:

    “We will feel the same joy when the monster now
    in the People’s White House and Oval Office,
    is taken out and hanged by his scrawny neck.”

  6. Jan permalink
    March 17, 2013 11:00 am

    Me, too, oh, Liberal John.

    Maybe they (the Secret Service, the FBI, the corrupt judges)
    will get a glimpse of how Patriotic Americans feel about the impostor
    who theyshould have arrested years ago, all because they are derelict in
    their sworn duties.

    Millions of American citizens certainly
    have their wits together. They know the truth, the evidence is
    plain and proven, but only for those who have the IQ of
    someone over 120.

    Americans will not take anymore of this tyranny.

    The fact that you are willing to live under a dictatorship
    where you are sent to prison w/o a trial, on shaky ‘evidence’

    and disarmed so you can’t defend yourself from murderers,

    willing to obey a mandate to have health insurance,

    happy as a lark to see billions of dollars go to the enemy

    gracious enough to welcome thousands and thousands of
    illegals into this country, many of them of the criminal mind,

    amazingly upbeat about the infidels Obama brings to the
    US government,

    blind to the many crimes he has committed..

    and to honor a person who is an abomination to God..

    and so it goes, ad nauseum..

    all that says a lot about you as a citizen of this country
    and your moral compass.

    All that says a lot more about your perception of a
    free country.

    All that says a lot about what sort of leadership
    and what kind of nation you need to find for
    your homeland.

    Face it, It isn’t this nation as it was meant to be.

    It is this nation, however, as Obama would have it become.

    As for his being hanged, well, a guillotine is too French,
    hanging is sort of cowboy/Western, and shooting.. well,
    guns are being outlawed by the victim,

    so a good old-fashioned gassing would work just as well.

    That is how the death penalty is carried out nowadays
    in our civilized society.

  7. March 17, 2013 8:35 pm

    Yes, I really think some patriot should send this along to them – – -

  8. Jan permalink
    March 18, 2013 6:26 am

    Go ahead, liberal John,
    make my day.

  9. Jan permalink
    March 18, 2013 6:30 am

    And spend some of your time on the petition to congress… read the 47,000
    comments, all of them in sync with each other. Here is a sample:

    M W. from Vernon Hill, VA writes:



    There is more than enough proof of O’Tyrant being born in Kenya..

    Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya.

    2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama’s Home Country Is KENYA!!

    2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean –

    2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home –

    Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama’s then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”
    The booklet, which was distributed to “business colleagues” in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel.
    It also promotes Obama’s anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White–which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.

  10. Jan permalink
    March 18, 2013 8:10 pm

    Found this info about the chemical weapons found in Iraq:


    By late 2003, even the Bush White House’s staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

    But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction.

    An initial glance at the WikiLeaks war logs doesn’t reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq. But chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.

    In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base.

    Three months later, in northern Iraq, U.S. scouts went to
    look in on a “chemical weapons” complex. “One of the bunkers has been tampered with,” they write. “The integrity of the seal [around the complex] appears intact, but it seems someone is interesting in trying to get into the bunkers.”

    Meanwhile, the second battle of Fallujah was raging in Anbar province. In the southeastern corner of the city, American forces came across a “house with a chemical lab … substances found are similar to ones (in lesser quantities located a previous chemical lab.” The following day, there’s a call in another part of the city for explosive experts to dispose of a “chemical cache.”

    Nearly three years later, American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.”

    In WikiLeaks’ massive trove of nearly 392,000 Iraq war logs are hundreds of references to chemical and biological weapons. Most of those are intelligence reports or initial suspicions of WMD that don’t pan out. In July 2004, for example, U.S. forces come across a Baghdad building with gas masks, gas filters, and containers with “unknown contents” inside. Later investigation revealed those contents to be vitamins.

    But even late in the war, WMDs were still being unearthed. In the summer of 2008, according to one WikiLeaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents. “These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”

    A small group — mostly of the political right — has long maintained that there was more evidence of a major and modern WMD program than the American people were led to believe. A few Congressmen and Senators gravitated to the idea, but it was largely dismissed as conspiratorial hooey.

    The WMD diehards will likely find some comfort in these newly-WikiLeaked documents. Skeptics will note that these relatively small WMD stockpiles were hardly the kind of grave danger that the Bush administration presented in the run-up to the war.

    But the more salient issue may be how insurgents and Islamic extremists (possibly with the help of Iran) attempted to use these lethal and exotic arms. As Spencer noted earlier, a January 2006 war log claims that “neuroparalytic” chemical weapons were smuggled in from Iran.

    That same month, then “chemical weapons specialists” were apprehended in Balad. These “foreigners” were there specifically “to support the chemical weapons operations.” The following month, an intelligence report refers to a “chemical weapons expert” that “provided assistance with the gas weapons.” What happened to that specialist, the WikiLeaked document doesn’t say.

  11. March 19, 2013 11:20 am

    There is no cure!


  1. Hope and Fear: Obama into 2014 – American Thinker – articles – Google News | Fonte English
  2. Hope and Fear: Obama into 2014 – American Thinker – articles – Google News
  4. Forbidden News » Obama 2014: Hope And Fear
  5. Eileen F. Toplansky ~ Hope And Fear: Obama Into 2014 | Shift Frequency

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 472 other followers

%d bloggers like this: