Skip to content

Barack Obama Soetoro: Criminal Imposter

January 22, 2013

One of my favorite writers and true patriot, Devvy Kidd wrote a fantastic piece yesterday pointing out the betrayal of America via the swearing in again of a fraud as president of the United States. I’m thinking about putting some excerpts here for my two daily visitors to read and then I’ll provide a link to the entire article.

Criminal Impostor Who Usurped The Office Of President Sworn In, Again

By Devvy Kidd 


For the second time, a criminal who is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office, will be sworn in by turn coat, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts.

Law  offices of Orly Taitz

“Chief  Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled  a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s  use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged         Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned  to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations  in the state of California alone.

“Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Co-counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison. Obama Forgerygate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number.”

So, on February 15, 2013, three weeks after the usurper is “sworn”  into office, once AGAIN justices on the U.S. Supreme Court will look at  the evidence millions have already seen! Is this not incredible?

Barry  Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, released a forged birth certificate to the world. There isn’t a scintilla of proof he was born in Hawaii.  Despite what $16 million dollar a year pimp, Bill O’Reilly says, two ads in a newspaper in Hawaii does not qualify as proof Soetoro was born there.  It sure as heck doesn’t qualify him as a ‘natural born citizen’. But, then, O’Reilly certainly has never let facts stand in his way as he bloviates  five nights a week.

There’s  no question Soetoro’s Selective Service Registration Card was altered; a forgery and a felony. It also means he cannot hold any job in the U.S. government: Register for the Draft: It’s Still the Law – “Federal Jobs – men born  after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service.”         Soetoro should have to pay back his salary and more than a billion dollars  in expenses to the American people.

It has  already been proven Soetoro’s SSN didn’t clear with E-Verify, the program  designed to check SSNs to keep illegals from obtaining employment in the  U.S. E-Verify says Soetoro’s SSN doesn’t match his name. Now, is he an  illegal alien on top of all his other crimes?

There’s  no question in my mind his passport records were sanitized:

Two  Fired for Viewing Obama Passport File Did  CIA pick sanitize Obama’s passport records?

February  15, 2013, won’t be the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has looked at  Soetoro…


Going  on five years, judges from several states, several Secretary’s of State, the U.S. Supreme Court, former Gov. Linda Lingel of Hawaii and EVERY member  of the Outlaw Congress, including Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, have all allowed this incredible, blatant usurpation of an office never  seen in the history of this country. Gutless cowards, all of them. This  is an on-going conspiracy that should be either a federal or state RICO  case.

On January  9, 2009, every member of the Outlaw Congress sat mute, including hot shots like Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint and other so-called leaders,  while the electoral college votes were read and accepted. Not one had the courage to stand up for the U.S. Constitution or their oath of office. The issue of Soetoro’s eligibility was raging at the time and they knew it.


Never  in my life have I ever seen anything like this; Watergate pales in comparison. The breadth and scope of this ongoing conspiracy is staggering. The fact that members of the U.S. Supreme Court are going to actually sit in conference and consider evidence  of crimes against the fraud the Chief Justice just swore less than a month before is, well, one can hardly find the words.


About these ads
23 Comments leave one →
  1. January 22, 2013 3:38 pm

    Well,It’s about time. Let the truth be told. As far as I am concern any,action Obama made as president is NULL and VOID!

    • January 22, 2013 3:40 pm

      Amen sister!

    • January 23, 2013 8:30 am

      But then it isn’t up to us to determine which of the president’s actions are null and void because nothing we can say is going to change anything. The way to change things is to run for office and get elected.

      By the way, if everything the president did was null and void, then let’s get something going to get some of the unemployed to pay back their unemployment benefits that he got extended.

      That would be a good start wouldn’t it?

    • January 23, 2013 8:50 pm

      You got me their on the un-employment. I’m a little to old to run for anything. Obama is a fraud and everyone knows it!

  2. January 23, 2013 10:29 pm

    Everybody perhaps – – – except for the multiple millions of people who voted to give him his second term in office, right?

    • January 24, 2013 6:48 am

      The officers and Pharisees didn’t believe Jesus was the Christ either John. Deceit was rampant then and it is now even more.
      Also many of those who voted for Obama know he’s a fraud … they just don’t care as long as they get what they are after.

    • January 24, 2013 7:15 am

      So isn’t that the goal of almost anyone who votes? To get what they are after?

      Isn’t that why both parties argue and fuss back and forth? To get what they are after?

      Isn’t that the reason everyone who works punches that old time clock? To get what they are after?

      I know plenty of staunch Republicans who just can’t wait to get their hands on some of those government hand-outs and some of them are related to me – – – cough! hack! spit! Puke!) (Never ever thought I would admit to something like that)…

      By the way – – it didn’t matter whether the “officers and pharisees (don’t forget the saducees and tax collectors ) believed in Jesus or not!

      It doesn’t matter a little bit who believes and who don’t!

      It don’t change the fact that Jesus Is Lord!

      By the same token, it don’t matter even a little bit what some bunch of right-headed sour-grapes sore losers think about the president either – – – he is still the president and he was legitimately and duly elected by The People – – and nothing is going to change that either.

      I voted for Obama and I don’t have any evidence that he is a fraud.

      A lot of my friends and family voted for Obama and none of them have any evidence that he is any kind of fraud either.

      In fact, I believe that legitimate resources all over the country and the world have long since debunked all the “Obama” conspiracy theories – – except perhaps in a few stubborn pockets of resistance here and there and I imagine these will always be with us.

      Fact is, most of America is happy with their election results – – –

      The dissidents are in the slimmest of minorities.

      Yep! I got what I was after too. . . .

      A Real President – – a President who will go down in History as one of our greatest – – right up there with old Tom Jefferson, Abe Lin-kern and the rest of them.

      And all the ranting and all the raving from all the right-heads in the world won’t change that one iota either!

      Guess what?

      There is happiness and joy and peace left in the world for those who want to recognize the fact!

      All my best to everyone.


    • January 24, 2013 7:39 am

      It’s shameful that a person, one who is supposedly intelligent, can put forth such a meaningless comment. All the while completely missing the point of previous comments. And John we’ve talked about this and I’m not going to allow you to come over here to instigate. I appreciate your input but please confine the drivel … “Yep! I got what I was after too. . . .
      A Real President – – a President who will go down in History as one of our greatest – – right up there with old Tom Jefferson, Abe Lin-kern and the rest of them.” to your own blog.
      In other words don’t come on here with the intent of pissing me and my readers off.

    • January 24, 2013 6:06 pm

      “Comments offered … should be short and to the point and in no case should exceed 100 words in length.”

    • January 24, 2013 6:19 pm

      (2) Comments containing links to videos will not be permitted.

    • January 24, 2013 6:24 pm

      Quit trippin’ … remain ignorant.

    • January 24, 2013 9:12 pm

      heh! heh! heh!

      Ignorance does not win elections!

    • January 25, 2013 6:59 am

      Oh, but it does which is evidenced by the last one.

  3. smrstrauss permalink
    January 25, 2013 2:04 pm

    Re: “Despite what $16 million dollar a year pimp, Bill O’Reilly says, two ads in a newspaper in Hawaii does not qualify as proof Soetoro was born there.”

    Answer. They were not ads. Hawaii newspapers did not accept advertising for the section of the paper called “Health Bureau Statistics,” which is where Obama’s birth certificate appeared. As the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH of Hawaii confirm, only the DOH could send birth notices to the “Health Bureau Statistics” section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.

    Obama has shown both his short form and long form birth certificates, and the officials in Hawaii of BOTH political parties, including the former Republican governor, have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and that the facts on them are accurate.

    There is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, and it is not the only proof of his having being born in Hawaii.

    There is also the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (which were only sent by the DOH to that section of the paper, the “Health Bureau Statistics” section, and the DOH only did so for births in Hawaii.) So there are those two proofs in addition to the birth certificate, and Obama’s Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that HE WAS BORN IN HAWAII (birther sites simply cut off the tape before she was asked where he was born.)

    Now turning to the allegation that Obama’s birth certificate was forged. One proof that it is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

    Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it, especially since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

    The claims that Obama’s birth certificate are forged come from birther “analysts”—–who have not shown that they are even analysts, and who CERTAINLY have not shown that they are fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review do not believe the birther analysts. And birther sites do not quote the analysts who say that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate. For example:

    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. … I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

    Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery. “I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

    Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

    Moreover, for Obama not to be a Natural Born Citizen, Obama would have had to have been born in some country other than in the USA, and that—considering how far Hawaii is from the nearest foreign country and the fact that pregnant women seldom traveled long distances late in pregnancy in 1961 AND that the officials in Hawaii and the birth certificate and the birth notices in Hawaii say that he was born in Hawaii—is not very likely at all.

    Birthers can keep on claiming that they believe that the birth certificate is forged and that Obama was born in a foreign country, but if they cannot convince even Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan of that fact, or Ann Coulter or the National Review, or any member of the US Electoral College (none of whose members switched their vote from Obama to McCain in 2008 or Obama to Romney in 2012 because of birther claims)—they will be as relevant as the folks who continue to believe that the Earth is really flat.

    • January 25, 2013 2:32 pm

      …… “a fool’s voice is known by multitude of words.” Ecc.. 5:3

    • smrstrauss permalink
      January 25, 2013 2:33 pm

      Notice that Cry and Howl does not discuss the facts? (Wonder why????)

    • January 25, 2013 2:52 pm

      The facts are throughout this entire blog site. I’ve seen all the tired old b.s. in your comment many times. Go back to sleep.

    • smrstrauss permalink
      January 25, 2013 3:12 pm

      But you do not discuss the facts that I have presented.

      First, you would have to explain how Obama got his short form birth certificate from Hawaii without a birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii IN THE DOH FILES IN HAWAII. Unless the clerk was lying when she or he filled in the form, and the officials of the Republican party were lying later, Obama was sent a short-form birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii on it. Yet, the procedure for generating a short-form birth certificate was for the clerk to look into the file and fill out the computer form that generated the short form birth certificate. Unless there was a birth certificate in the file and it said on it that Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, the clerk would not have generated the short-form birth certificate saying that he was born in Hawaii. (The only possibility is that the clerk and the officials who confirmed the birth certificate are all lying–but why should they?)

      Once you have answered that, you might turn to this question, which I have not asked before. It is about the allegation that Obama was born in a foreign country.

      If you really think that Obama COULD have been born in another country. You could answer the following questions:

      Questions for those who continue to believe that Obama was born outside of the USA.

      I’ll bet that you know (but you may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA requires some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.

      (Sure, a child could be carried across the Mexican border, but Hawaii does not have a border with Mexico, so that can be eliminated as a possiblity.)

      So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy in that country, wouldn’t they?

      Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?

      All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.
      Well, they never did. There is no such file.

      So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

      Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and those in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)––and yet no document has been found. Why not?

      The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on the Hawaii birth certificate by THREE Republican (and several Democrat officials in Hawii) plus the notices in the Hawaii “Health Bureau Statistics” sections of the newspapers, which were sent to the papers ONLY by the DOH of Hawaii and only for births in Hawaii. How do you explain all that?

      (The claim that the notices could have been placed by lying relatives turns out to be false because whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on a witness statement.)

      So, how come there is no proof that Obama entered the USA in 1961 or received a US travel document in 1961, but there is legal and factual proof that he was born in Hawaii?

      Please answer the questions and do not claim that they have been answered before. They haven’t. And even if they were, which they weren’t, you would not convince anyone on this site without an answer on this site.

    • January 25, 2013 2:56 pm

      But they do discuss facts! I have seen them do it!

    • smrstrauss permalink
      January 25, 2013 3:16 pm

      My questions for you are listed above:

      (1) How come there was a short-form birth certificate for Obama when they are generated by a clerk looking at the document in the file and entering the facts from that document (Unless the clerk and the officials who confirmed the clerk’s actions were all lying). Or, unless Obama was able to forge a Hawaii birth certificate and slip it into the files, which is hard to imagine since he was only a junior senator from Illinois at the time.

      (2) If Obama was born in Kenya or in any country other than the USA, how come there has been no record found of his parents applying for a US travel document to get him from that country to the USA? (Children do require US visas or to be entered on one of their parents’ US passports to be allowed in, you know.)

  4. January 25, 2013 6:08 pm

    I am told this “smrstrauss” is an “O-bot” whatever the heck that is! Hey smrstrauss, if you are a real person come to american liberal times and talk to me .

    • smrstrauss permalink
      January 26, 2013 4:47 am

      I am a real person. An O-bot or obot is merely a conservative term for a supporter of Obama. Where the issue of his place of birth and Natural Born Citizen status is concerned, there are birthers (who say that they do not believe that Obama was born in Hawaii or is not a NBC because of his father’s citizenship) and obots, who say that there is no problem on either front. Neither is necessarily a pejorative term. They are simply short-hand expressions for people who think that Obama is not eligible for one reason or another and people who do think that he is eligible, just as the short hand during Prohibition was “drys” and “wets.” But, oddly, some of the conservative leaders do think that there is something seriously wrong with birthers. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly and the National Review have all in one way or another called them crazy.

    • January 26, 2013 4:51 am

      You speak my kind of language and I think we are somewhat in the nature of kindred spirits on political views.

      I therefore would be grateful if you could provide me with the url to a blog of yours or something so I can keep in touch.

      Best regards.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 473 other followers

%d bloggers like this: