Skip to content

Sandy Hook: The Curious Case Of Emilie Parker

January 16, 2013

I found a very interesting piece at Before It’s News and I’m thinking of sharing it here. I’m also thinking of posting the piece here in it’s entirety exactly as it’s presented there (as much as possible) and I’ll provide links back to the original. Right up front, I did not write the piece. It’s not too long and worth a look. Here we go:

Sandy Hook: The Curious Case Of Emilie Parker

(Before It’s News)

When news came on December 14, 2012, that a gunman had killed 6 adults and 20 young children in Sandy Hook Elementary School, Newtown, Connecticut, I was in shock — like you were. Even after the many gun shootings of the recent past — in Aurora, CO; Tucson, AZ; Virginia Tech, VA; Columbine, CO — Americans were stricken by this latest massacre because 6 and 7-year-old little children were the victims. A moral barrier was crossed, which even the most cynical among us find intolerable.

Since then, however, so many inconsistencies, anomalies, and unanswered questions have arisen about the official version of the Sandy Hook massacre, that doubt and skepticism increasingly are expressed. Where is the school’s security surveillance tape? What about those police and eyewitness reports of other suspicious individuals on the scene, including at least one man wearing camo pants whom police handcuffed? Why is there such a strong resemblance between some of Sandy Hook parents and families and professional “crisis actors”? For these and other anomalies, go to FOTM’s new “Sandy Hook” page.

With no intention to downplay the gravity of Sandy Hook or to disrespect the victims and their families, I must ask certain uncomfortable questions about child victim Emilie Parker and her family. I don’t have any predisposed assumptions or conjectures concerning those questions and their implications. I am simply exercising my First Amendment free speech right by asking questions. (My questions below are colored red.)

emilie-parker2

1. The “Emilie Parker Fund” Facebook Page

On December 14, 2012, angelic-looking 6-year-old Emilie Parker was brutally murdered by Lanza. Reportedly, he had shot every child multiple times, some up to 11 times.

On the same day, December 14, someone — either a family member or a friend who has the family’s permission — created the Emilie Parker Fund page on Facebook to solicit donation for her family. Here’s a screenshot of Emilie Parker Fund‘s “Info” page showing its date of creation:

emilie-parker-fund

The donation page was created a day before the actual memorial page, R.I.P. Emilie Parker, was created on Facebook! Here’s a screenshot of the Info page of R.I.P. Emilie Parker, showing it was created on Dec. 15, 2012, a day after Emilie Parker was killed:

rip-emilie-parker-page1

If your precious 6-year-old daughter had just been shot to death, would you immediately think about soliciting money from strangers for yourself, as well as have the presence of mind to set up a page on Facebook with the following detailed instructions?:

Instructions on the Emilie Parker Memorial Account at America First Credit Union (account #5001359). For AFCU members making a transfer, select the Savings as the type of account, and the last name on the account is Parker. For non AFCU members, the AFCU routing number is 324377516. This account has been shared by several Utah media outlets and can be trusted. Thank you.

A PAYPAL account is also available if you use the email brookeprothero@yahoo.com

That email address presumably belongs to Brooke Prothero. A woman by that name, Brooke Ann Prothero, has a Facebook page, with an “About” page devoid of information, other than that she lives in Ogden Utah — in which the Parker family had lived before they moved to Sandy Hook, Connecticut.

2. The Strange Behavior of Emilie’s father, Robbie Parker

On December 15, 2012, a day after his daughter had been brutally murdered, Robbie Parker choked back his tears (no tear actually materialized) as he made a statement to the press. The only problem is this: Mere seconds before Parker began his anguished tribute to his slain daughter, the grief-stricken dad was laughing and joking!

Here he is again, going from grinning happily to being grief-stricken in the blink of an eye:

If your precious 6-year-old daughter had died a horrible death just a day ago, would you be smiling, laughing, and joking?

3. Robbie and Alissa Parker smiling with Obama

On December 16, 2012, Barack Obama visited Newtown, CT, during which this photo was taken with Emilie’s parents, Robbie and Alissa:

parker-family-photoop-with-oFrom left to right: Robbie Parker (his face obscured, holding a blonde girl), Obama, Alissa Parker, unknown woman holding another blonde girl.

If your precious 6-year-old daughter had been brutally slaughtered just two days ago, would you smilingly pose for a photo-op with the president?

4. Emilie’s Double Posing With Obama

Then there’s the now-famous photo of a girl who looks very much like Emilie, wearing Emilie’s dress, posing with Obama during his visit to Newtown two days after Emilie’s death:

obama-with-sandy-hook-kidsSee that angelic-looking blonde girl in that darling black-and-red dress standing in front of Obama?

Here’s that girl again in the Parker family portrait below — or is it?:

parker-family-picFrom left to right: mom Alissa Parker, 4-year-old Madeline, Robbie Parker, 3-year-old Samantha, Emilie.

Who’s the blonde girl wearing Emilie’s dress posing with Obama? Emilie’s younger lookalike sister, Madeline?

To help us compare, I’ve put cropped pictures of Emilie and Madeline and put them side by side (see below):

emilie-parker-composite1 = Emilie

2 = Madeline

3a and 3b = unknown girl posing with Obama

5. The Weird Parker Family Portrait

Do you remember the Parker family portrait? Did you notice anything strange about it? Here it is, again (take a close look at the yellow circles I’ve drawn on the picture):

parker-family-pic2Good grief. Am I losing my mind? Where are Madeline’s and Samantha’s legs?

And isn’t little Samantha’s left hand making a devil’s horn sign, and little Madeline’s right hand also making a devil’s horn?

Here’s a blow-up of their hands:

parker-family-hands

Devil’s horn sign aside, doesn’t Samantha’s left hand (two fingers in her mouth) look deformed to you?

I have not tampered with or photoshopped the Parker family portrait. The picture was taken from the R.I.P. Emily Parker Facebook page. You can verify this for yourself by going to the Facebook page.

H/t HenryMakow

~Eowyn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There it is. Judge for yourself.  Here is the link to the piece at beforeitsnews.com

About these ads
5 Comments leave one →
  1. jericho777 permalink
    January 17, 2013 2:15 am

    Reblogged this on Jericho777's Blog.

  2. Donna permalink
    January 18, 2013 12:08 pm

    OMG!!

    You ask “where are Madeline and Samantha’s legs”

    Look at the hemline of Samantha’s dress. She’s clearly straddling her dad’s leg.
    As for Madeline. it’s hard to tell, but common sense will tell you she’s either sitting the same way as Samantha, or they are between his legs and hidden by Samantha’s dress.
    To assume they aren’t there because you can’t see them is just….well, is just laughable.
    Without the children sitting in his lap, the position of Mr. Parkers arms and hands are a little hard to explain away. Were THEY “photoshopped” as well? I notice you never mentioned this little piece of the photo.

    Devil-horn signs?? Again, OMG!!
    On Madeline’s hand, it is clear she has ONE finger (forefinger) hooked onto Samantha’s dress. And the pinky? Only the knuckle is visible and even if she DID have it stuck out, it would be hidden by her dads hand.
    As for Samantha’s fingers looking “deformed”. Look at it again. You aren’t looking at the BACK of her hand, you are looking at the PALM. Do you see it now?

    She’s also NOT making the “Devil’s-horn” sign any more than Madeline is. If she’d had ALL her fingers in her mouth, you’d be saying they forgot to photoshop them in like they did their legs.

    Sheesh!!

    • January 18, 2013 1:09 pm

      Well Donna, I don’t know why your panties are in a wad. I didn’t write the piece which if you would have read the introduction paragraph you possibly would have gotten that. Personally, I don’t see any indication of the child with her legs between the guy’s legs. If the picture was “photoshopped” like you suggest why not do it right so there wouldn’t be people like you who read the unreadable?
      For me, I don’t give a rat’s ass about the pictures … but it’s about the phony “grieving” parents who takes a minute to work up his grief after joking it up with the camera crew.
      OMG! and Sheesh!!

  3. Donna permalink
    January 18, 2013 4:52 pm

    If my “panties are in a wad”, it’s because this article disgusts me.
    Articles such as this and people who re-post them are perpetrating a lie against a family who have done nothing to warrant this type of response, other than not behave in the way others feel they should.

    I never said you DID write the article, but you did share it. I notice you made no mention of any portion you may NOT have agreed with. So you can’t fault me for making that assumption.

    I also never “suggested” the picture was photoshopped.

    • January 18, 2013 5:39 pm

      And why would the article disgust you? Like I said, I don’t care about the pictures as they provide no real evidence of anything and could possibly be photo shopped. But the video and a whole bunch of others tell a much different story than what we’ve been told.
      That is why I simply posted the piece as is. People can make up their own minds.

      There were quite a lot of people who didn’t believe Lance Armstrong was doping either and I posted http://cryandhowl.com/2013/01/15/dead-flies/ to make a point of how adamantly people will defend something and mock, belittle and demean others who question it. And look how that turned out.

      Remember this … “The simple believeth every word, but the prudent man looketh well to his going.”

      Anyway thank you for visiting and commenting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 471 other followers

%d bloggers like this: