Skip to content

Obama sanctioned weapons used in Benghazi attack

December 7, 2012

I see the White House has a new Christmas, correction: “holiday” card and it’s quite touching. Personally I’d rather look at the dog than the faux first family. Oh I know that probably offends some people, but in this new world where nothing is as it seems, someone has to tell it like it really is.  It’s disheartening given the time of year to have to think about all the scandals, cover-ups, lies, misdirection, treasonous acts and murders committed by team Obama … and then have to look at the grinning “first family” and feel no joy. For sure there is no joy for the family members left behind suffering the grief of needlessly losing their loved ones as Obama and company placed them in deadly situations and in some cases provided the weapons that were used to murder them. Next came the lies, varying accounts, cover-up and manipulation of facts to provide “plausible deniability” (plausible … not!) for Barack Obama. In the past presidents have been impeached or had to resign in shame for much less, but now that the Congress has been overwhelmed with corrupt and compromised people, Obama can continue his lawless and treasonous acts without fear of prosecution.

I read an interesting piece this morning concerning the Benghazi Massacre and how Obama most likely provided the weapons used in the murders of Ambassador Stevens and the other three Americans. The questions in the article should never even be … but is typical of the “transparent” Obama regime. No truthful answers … nothing but stonewalling, cover-ups, lies, delays and misdirection until it “goes away”.

Thanks to Kris Zane at The Western Center For Journalism

Why would the Obama administration spend two weeks parroting a ridiculous story about a “protest turned violent” because of an anti-Muslim YouTube video being the cause of the attack on the Benghazi consulate?

Why would they then spend a month blaming the CIA for bad intel?

Why would they then comb through a former four-star general’s, then CIA-chief Petraeus’ email to “uncover” an adulterous affair that apparently everyone—including Obama—already knew about?

Fox News has been reporting that Obama, through Christopher Stevens, had been shipping Libyan arms to the Syrian rebels, some of them linked to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Was this the reason Obama has been turning his administration into a pretzel trying to explain why he blamed a YouTube video for the murder of four Americans?

Was this the reason Obama has been turning his administration into a pretzel trying to explain why he blamed a YouTube video for the murder of four Americans?

Was this the reason he refused to send in air or ground support to the dozens of Americans under fire, where Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods begged for help for upwards of seven hours and were eventually slaughtered?

Or was it something more?


About these ads
2 Comments leave one →
  1. AFVET permalink
    December 7, 2012 1:05 pm

    Isn’t interesting that Fast and Furious and the Benghazi affair have been essentially swept under the rug ?
    What happened to Darrell Issa ?
    Are the investigations ongoing ?
    I feel that impeachment proceedings should be started immediately.
    Every time you turn the radio or the TV on, the fiscal cliff is slammed in our faces all the while Obama is planning a 4 million dollar vacation in Hawaii.
    Obama is laughing at US because he has the ball and he is in control of the game.
    Boehner is eliminating conservative influence by dismissing certain members on key committees that do not conform to the RINO philosophy he maintains.
    Boehner needs to be voted out of his position as Speaker.
    He is nothing more than Pelosi in pants.

    Rand Paul has said that the economy should be placed squarely on the democrat’s shoulders.
    I agree, but with the insistence that they are the ones to be blamed for it.
    With the MSM in Obummers pocket, what are the chances of that ?

  2. December 9, 2012 11:57 pm

    I read about that a few weeks ago and I felt a bit torn. It almost seemed as though they were trying to paint Stevens as a bad guy, and almost deserving of his fate.

    At the same time, I don’t doubt for 1 second that there was gun running going on.

    I also believe it was likely a staged event, that O was going to have them “kidnapped” so he could “negotiate” and “save” them at the last minute, just before the election.

    And, what AFVET said. :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 473 other followers

%d bloggers like this: