Skip to content

How CNN, Candy Crowley and Barack Obama cheated during the debate on Oct. 16, 2012

October 18, 2012

I know I’ve been writing about the debate since it took place. Honestly, I was surprised that Obama did as well as he did and had given some thought about it. Well now I’m not surprised at all and I’ve gone from surprised to very ‘chapped’ about it. I visited Christine’s blog site Talk Wisdom and she had featured a piece that pointed out what I had seen but couldn’t put it together … one of the segments where Barack Obama, the low-life in chief cheated during the debate Tuesday night. Let’s take a look …

All credit is given to  and The Last Refuge blog.

Here we go:

In the history books of wool-over-sheeple-eye-removal this might, just might, go down as one of the most obvious and over-the-top Machiavellian media manuevers ever.

Watching it unfold on live TV it did not seem right. It was awkwardly and comfortably scripted, and too smooth in execution. But watching it on replay the agenda filled manipulation was obvious. It appears Candy Crowley and CNN together with the Obama Administration scripted the Libyan injection into the Presidential Debate.

I’m not just talking about Candy Crowley interjecting on behalf of President Obama, and interrupting Mitt Romney, I mean the whole segment seemed like it was a set up.

So we did a little research:

Candy Crowley told Erin Burnett on CNN’s show Out Front, Monday Night 10/15, that she had collected the questions from the invited and vetted debate audience at Hofstra University and was reviewing them. This was Monday on the 7pm broadcast of Erin Burnett. The Debate was Tuesday.

When the question on Libya was asked by audience member Kerry Ladka, he prefaced the question by saying:

….this question actually comes from my, err, um, a brain trust of my friends at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola, yesterday we were sitting around talking about Libya…

If Candy Crowley already had the audience questions assembled the day before, how could Kerry Ladka and his brain trust friends have been writing one?

Secondly, look at the origin and subject switch from Candy Crowley. When she said “we are changing topics to a question from Kerry… from Kerry Ladka“, Obama already knew what to look for and where he was seated. There are numerous “TELLS” Watch the video – it is at 1:06:35 Watch.

President Obama moved (physically walked) directly toward Kerry Ladka, and said “Hi Kerry“,… (but oddly Kerry had not moved, nor identified himself) …. then, rut roh,…. after an internal psyche trigger kicked in, President Obama does the ((‘oops’)) *looks around* as if to say where am I going… then asks “what’s your name“?

Thirdly, within the carefully worded question itself is a very nuanced descriptive delivered by Ladka:

…”and we were reading, and we became aware of reports that the State Department refused extra security for our embassy in Benghazi Libya prior to the attacks that killed four Americans.

Who was it that denied enhanced security, and why?

The term “enhanced security” is the term used by the White House spokespeople and by the State Department spokesperson(s). It is just plain awkward and oddly not in a normal context for a general question from an unattached observer. Not to mention it perfectly “Tee’s Up” the only construct, and context, that Obama could defend and expand upon.

Fourth. Michelle Obama appears to know the moment is at hand and fails to contain her excitment upon execution. There is a FOX News camera angle that actually shows her response during a cutaway portion. No-one realized she was on tape…. And you’re not going to believe what she was doing…. just watch:

Yes, that’s right. The LOUD clapping you can hear in the audience is from none other than Michelle Obama herself who is responding to the put down of Governor Romney’s question by Candy Crowley. She knew all along the risk to Obama that Libya presents, and she appears giddy upon execution of the misdirection.

Fifth Point - Kerry Ladka works for Global Telecom Supply. More specifically he works for Isaac Elyassoff who is the current Vice-President at Global Telecom Supply. Guess where Elyassoff is an alumnus of ? Yep, Hofstra University, the site of the debate. It appears Elyassoff is in his mid twenties having graduated from Hofstra with a degree in Marketing and Business 2002-2006. Obamabot? Ideology? Check out his twittery friends .


About these ads
7 Comments leave one →
  1. christinewjc permalink
    October 18, 2012 11:42 am

    GREAT JOB expanding upon this story, Steve! I also noticed that I got the name of the blog wrong!

    Will anyone in the media of mass deception pick up on this??? I won’t hold my breath…

    • October 18, 2012 12:12 pm

      I was reading in the comments section of that piece and people wondered why the media ignores this stuff. Man, could you imagine …
      That would be a block buster and a half!

  2. William Tomany permalink
    October 18, 2012 12:15 pm

    Candy was so out of line acting the part of the Presiden’t telepromter all night.
    it appeared to me that she had told the president what the questions were and from which person they would come.

    Over and over Candy saved her man. Fair debate it was not

    • October 18, 2012 12:17 pm

      Amen … and “Ray Charles” could see that! Yet waiting for the media to say something … all I hear are crickets!

  3. AFVET permalink
    October 18, 2012 1:31 pm

    This should be no surprise to anybody.
    The only way Obama gets ahead is to cheat.
    That’s how he has gotten as far as he has.
    Perhaps I’m wrong, perhaps it’s his high degree of integrity.
    Nah,…not so much.
    On a fair field, Obama would have been gone long ago.

  4. October 18, 2012 4:33 pm

    Reblogged this on yasniger and commented:
    The truth will not set this America free, they don’t even see it before their very eyes that Obama is a Hollywood script being played out.

  5. The MAD Jewess permalink
    October 20, 2012 12:22 am

    The B*TCH should resign.
    I am right and women get super p-ssed off at me;
    Women in office & or politics are a big, FAT mistake

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 472 other followers

%d bloggers like this: